9/25 Willey Range, Zealand Notch and Ethan Pond

vftt.org

Help Support vftt.org:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

grouseking

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 20, 2005
Messages
2,023
Reaction score
272
Location
Lebanon, NH Avatar: Philosopher?
This was an absolutely fantastic day and an amazing hike that tested me physically and mentally to the fullest extent. In the end I give myself an A even though I slowed down in the end. To explain...

Me and Brian arrived and set off hiking from the Ethan Pond trailhead at 6:30am Sat morning and decided to summit Willey, Field, Tom, descend via the A-Z trail, then onto Zealand Hut and finally out via the entire length of the Ethan Pond trail with a short side trip to Ethan Pond. If I remember correctly, the total mileage was about 17.7 miles including the mini side trips so it was easily the longest and most strenuous trip of my life. I was worried at first, especially since I have been getting over a nasty cold, but us making it to the Willey Range trail in less than 45 minutes made me feel much better.

Soon therafter, the serious climbing began. The trail sure doesn't waste any time climbing, which is good I suppose as it was a 1.1 trip to the summit. My favorite section was climbing the ladders. Thankfully I'm not scared of ladders, but I can see how these would be dangerous if they are very wet or icy. But on this day, the ladders were an immense help to an otherwise steep, rough and pain in the butt trail. Anyways, I struggled up to the top, starting to lose my breath near the summit, that is until the view from the outlook took my breath away! Crawford Notch, the Presis and so much more! We hung out there till we fully felt better and then I tagged number 13/48 for me and Brian bagged 17/48. Around the corner was a fantastic view of the Pemi wilderness which I couldn't get enough pics of. You could see the foliage beginning to roll down there and I was looking forward to walking out thru that area. But first, onto Field and Tom.

The walk from Willey was nice and green, and not too demanding on the legs. The biggest difference in hiking today than all hikes since June was, it was chilly! I saw my breath almost all day and that was more than evident in the shady cols between the mountains. Anyways we summited Field less than an hour later and were treated to a few limited views and stiff breeze that chilled me to the bone. ( I sweat a lot, so it doesn't take a lot for me to cool off.) That was # 18 for Brian, but just a repeater for me, as I summited Field and Tom last year. After a few min, it was off to Tom.

We saw our first people of the day halfway between Field and Tom. But that would be it until Zealand Hut (simply amazing). Views from Tom were great, but there is already a huge difference from last year(the firs are growing back real fast when looking at Carrigain). It was number 19 for Brian, and we spent a bit on the summit eating and being entertained by about 4 or 5 Gray Jays (actually they were quite annoying but cool at the same time). Soon therafter we were off to the A-Z trail.

I loved the A-Z trail! It was narrow, remote and had some nice foliage down low. It was prety much easy to follow and it felt like a moose could pop out at any time! My kind of trail. After a long trudge we popped out at the Zealand Trail and then struggled up to the hut. By then, we were pretty tired, and there was still over 7 miles to go.

After a long hour rest at the hut, and some fantastic cookies, off we went down the length of the Ethan Pond Trail. We made to time to Zeacliff junction, but by now were needing to take breaks more frequently. So we stopped to admire the wild Zealand Notch for a while and then cruised up past Thoreau Falls, and then stopped again at the Shoal Pond trail junction. I was so close to taking the .7 detour, but decided that I was tired enough to begin with. Next time...

Well, by now I was dragging but we still made fairly descent time, but I was really lagging behinf Brian. Little uphills were killing me, but we still made it to Ethan Pond in a little over an hour. After a 10-15 min break at this gem of a pond, it was time to go and head to the car...still 2.6 miles. By now my legs were beginning to cramp, and just five min before the bottom i slipped on some dirt and that sent my left calf into a serious spasm for a good 10 min. It was ridiculous and I nearly passed out, I was in bad shape. But when that drama passed, we walked out 5 min later satisfied and sore. I know now my limits...no more than 15 miles! But soon I will work up to it.

It was an amazing day, and I took nearly 200...yes 200 pictures from the day. Here are the pics if anyone is interested.

Willeys etc 1
Willeys etc 2
grouseking
 
I'm glad you had a great time for the most part! Last month I did Willey, Field, Tom, Zealand, and the Bonds but got absolutely no views from any of them. I also had a tough time finishing without injury but I had a great time. I love your pictures and look forward to future posts. Good luck resting your body and I'll see you out there!
 
Tomahawk and I did a lot of that trip last month, completly socked in! You're pictures help me imagine what the scenic outlooks looked like. Nice pictures and good job.
 
hehe i only stopped because you did hehe or i would've walked nearly non stop j/k. def was a good day. that makes two for me this season :)
 
jjo said:
Great Pics!!! Sounds and looks like you had a terrific day. Loved your photos. What type of Cam did you use??? Thanks


I use a Canon Powershot A-75 3.2 mp...I really don't know what I'm doing when it comes to taking pictures. I do know I don't have the best camera out there, but I know what to look at I suppose. It does help the the White Mtns are beautiful and you can usually find a wonderful view around every corner! I'd like to have a camera with more megapixels I think, or one with a better zoom and possibly a filter, but right now things are just fine.

grouseking
 
grouseking said:
I use a Canon Powershot A-75 3.2 mp...I really don't know what I'm doing when it comes to taking pictures. I do know I don't have the best camera out there, but I know what to look at I suppose. It does help the the White Mtns are beautiful and you can usually find a wonderful view around every corner! I'd like to have a camera with more megapixels I think, or one with a better zoom and possibly a filter, but right now things are just fine.

grouseking

Your pics are excellent. As u say, it helps that the whites are beautiful everywhere. I have a more expensive cam (actually 2) and many of my pics are not up to your quality. Of course, I live in Illinois and only get to my beloved "whites" couple times a year. Keep taking pics and posting as you are.. I enjoyed your trip and shots...
 
More..

grouseking said:
I use a Canon Powershot A-75 3.2 mp...
grouseking

Grouseking: Just realized my wife just got the Canon A85 4.0mp. Hope her pics are half as good as yours. Need to get her to the Whites altho a fall trip doesn't seem in the plans. Keep shooting
 
Megapixels

jjo said:
Grouseking: Just realized my wife just got the Canon A85 4.0mp. Hope her pics are half as good as yours. Need to get her to the Whites altho a fall trip doesn't seem in the plans. Keep shooting


What is the difference in megapixels anyway? I figure the higher the better. Are the pics more clear?

grouseking
 
The higher the megapixel, the more pixels the camera can store color to. So for example, my camera (Sony Cybershot) is 5 megapixel and can take pictures that are very sharp. I can also enlarge my pictures without losing any resolution. I am a fan of film cameras though except I can't rationalize taking one backpacking with me as I try to pack extralight. On day trips though I love to take my Nikon N-60 with a 70-300mm zoom lens to take the perfect shots!
 
Tomahawk is correct! The more mp, the greater the sharpness and detail. It shows up best when you enlarge a print. The higher the mp, the larger you can enlarge w/o losing clarity and detail. Generally, more mp is better but for most, 3 mp is adequate.
 
jjo said:
Tomahawk is correct! The more mp, the greater the sharpness and detail. It shows up best when you enlarge a print. The higher the mp, the larger you can enlarge w/o losing clarity and detail. Generally, more mp is better but for most, 3 mp is adequate.


Yeak 3.2 mp seems to be ok for me, but I'd sure like to be able to zoom better. :)

grouseking
 
Top