https://www.foxnews.com/us/co-worke...-behind-mountain-summit-during-office-retreat
That's going to be an interesting team meeting next week.......
That's going to be an interesting team meeting next week.......
My coworker's would do the same thing, don't trust any of them, lol. I love being a soloist, stress free hiking and great conversations with my dog.
"one member of their party was left to complete his final summit push alone"
It sounds like he decided to keep going by himself and everyone else is getting blamed since he got lost.
A group travels together and does not allow anyone to be left behind. There are obligations involved in forming a group. These people failed to meet them so they shoulder the majority of the blame. The hiker left behind is to blame for trusting them.
Not all group dynamics are the same. My hiking group is more of an assembly of solo hikers that camp together.
You can go solo or you can go with your dog. Not sure who is the leader there, but you are definitely a team.
A group travels together and does not allow anyone to be left behind. There are obligations involved in forming a group. These people failed to meet them so they shoulder the majority of the blame. The hiker left behind is to blame for trusting them.
The article said he “was left to complete his final summit push on his own.” That’s worded pretty ambiguously; does it mean everyone else wanted to turn back before summiting but he wanted to summit so he went alone? Or was he slower than them and still climbing as they were returning? To me the operative words are “[he] was left.” They didn’t say “he left the group.” The group started together and should have finished together. Short of dangerous weather being imminent they should have waited for him, or at a very minimum had at least a couple volunteers stay behind to hike down with him and police up all the trail markers they’d left. As someone who’s been both the slowpoke and waiting for the slowpoke that’s what I’d do, at least.There is a difference between someone getting left behind and someone deciding they are pushing for the summit on their own when the group is leaving the mountain.
The article said he “was left to complete his final summit push on his own.” That’s worded pretty ambiguously; does it mean everyone else wanted to turn back before summiting but he wanted to summit so he went alone? Or was he slower than them and still climbing as they were returning? To me the operative words are “[he] was left.” They didn’t say “he left the group.” The group started together and should have finished together. Short of dangerous weather being imminent they should have waited for him, or at a very minimum had at least a couple volunteers stay behind to hike down with him and police up all the trail markers they’d left. As someone who’s been both the slowpoke and waiting for the slowpoke that’s what I’d do, at least.
I say using your stuff as trail markers wasn’t too smart, either. It sounds like they were on an official trail, so there must have been blazes or something marking the route.Whoever pulled the trail markers is the real idiot here.
I say using your stuff as trail markers wasn’t too smart, either. It sounds like they were on an official trail, so there must have been blazes or something marking the route.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hansel_and_GretelI say using your stuff as trail markers wasn’t too smart, either.
Enter your email address to join: