Papa Bear
New member
I'm interested in the Garmin 60CSx primarily for finding things (benchmarks, peaks) and I am impressed by it's better sensitivity (especially under forest cover) than the 60CS that I now have.
But although the map display is pretty, I don't really need the maps in the field. Maps are good for macro orientation but typically when I'm either benchmark hunting or peak bagging (especially bushwhacking) I have already studied the topos available and I know where I am (in a gross sense - say within .1 - .25 mile). So I want waypoints, and routes, but I can wait till I get home to put them on a map. Besides I always carry a paper map (and compass of course) for when the GPS breaks just when I need it.
But feel free to explain why I really, really need the maps that I don't think I need. .
Question: is there a 60CSx variant available without the fancy maps? Or with stripped down maps? (Just trying to save some money here).
I see on-line that there is a 60Cx, which I thought might be the answer, but upon reading the specs that looks like the 60CSx without the altimeter.
Thanks in advance.
But although the map display is pretty, I don't really need the maps in the field. Maps are good for macro orientation but typically when I'm either benchmark hunting or peak bagging (especially bushwhacking) I have already studied the topos available and I know where I am (in a gross sense - say within .1 - .25 mile). So I want waypoints, and routes, but I can wait till I get home to put them on a map. Besides I always carry a paper map (and compass of course) for when the GPS breaks just when I need it.
But feel free to explain why I really, really need the maps that I don't think I need. .
Question: is there a 60CSx variant available without the fancy maps? Or with stripped down maps? (Just trying to save some money here).
I see on-line that there is a 60Cx, which I thought might be the answer, but upon reading the specs that looks like the 60CSx without the altimeter.
Thanks in advance.