It would depend on if they own the land under the huts. AMC reportedly only wants new capital assets that are on land they own. Given the investment in the 100 Mile Wilderness I don't see them going for this system as it dilutes the interest in the 100 MW which reportedly is paying their recreational development shortfall with endowment income and forestry operations. I think Flagstaff hut was surrounded or sits on Passamaquoddy tribal land formerly Dead River (
https://www.deadriver.com/about-us/our-history) and possibly Poplar Hut. Not sure about Stratton Brook or Grand Falls? . The question is are the assets worth more in pieces or as a whole?. I could speculate that the Grand falls hut would be of interest to whitewater rafting firms. Flagstaff Hut is probably good as a standalone sporting type camp on Flagstaff or a rich persons "camp", Stratton Brook is probably best tied to Sugarloaf, high end ski lodge?. Unfortunately Poplar Hut would be an "orphan".
The other big question is if there is any debt coming along for the ride?.
As discussed its a marketing effort. If the right people with disposable income don't know about the experience they will choose other better marketed alternatives. MHT did have consistent PR early on but it definitely has tapered off in the last few years.