Oncoman
Active member
Concerning NH200 list
Long Mtn 3661’ P = 1711’ (Lat = 44.6798; Lon = -71.3796) Prox. Parent = Sugarloaf
Long W. Pk 3661’ P = 1711’ (Lat = 44.6696; Lon = -71.4023)Prox. Parent = Sugarloaf
1 peak with 2 identical shoulders or 2 separate pks ? (col = 231’ between 2 pks)
Also
Huntington 3700’ p = 840’ (Lat = 44.0502; Lon = -71.4912) Prox. Parent = Hancock
Huntington S Pk 3700’ 2 bumps p = 840’(44.0464; -71.4850) & (44.0470; -71.4834)
(Col = 200’ between 2 pks)
My opinion is that if one uses the pragmatic rule that a pk must rise on all sides by 200' interpolated, than we have 4 seperate pks for above; but if we use the conventional interpolated prominence rules than we have only 2 pks and 2 additional pks need to be added to NH200 list + 15 others to compensate for 16 pks with less than 200' of prominence & adding Guyot which qualifies with p = 200'
Any prominence experts out there who can confirm...
Long Mtn 3661’ P = 1711’ (Lat = 44.6798; Lon = -71.3796) Prox. Parent = Sugarloaf
Long W. Pk 3661’ P = 1711’ (Lat = 44.6696; Lon = -71.4023)Prox. Parent = Sugarloaf
1 peak with 2 identical shoulders or 2 separate pks ? (col = 231’ between 2 pks)
Also
Huntington 3700’ p = 840’ (Lat = 44.0502; Lon = -71.4912) Prox. Parent = Hancock
Huntington S Pk 3700’ 2 bumps p = 840’(44.0464; -71.4850) & (44.0470; -71.4834)
(Col = 200’ between 2 pks)
My opinion is that if one uses the pragmatic rule that a pk must rise on all sides by 200' interpolated, than we have 4 seperate pks for above; but if we use the conventional interpolated prominence rules than we have only 2 pks and 2 additional pks need to be added to NH200 list + 15 others to compensate for 16 pks with less than 200' of prominence & adding Guyot which qualifies with p = 200'
Any prominence experts out there who can confirm...
Last edited: