U.S. Army proposes helicopter training on Whiteface Mountain

vftt.org

Help Support vftt.org:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

BlackSpruce

New member
Joined
Sep 8, 2003
Messages
664
Reaction score
158
http://www.pressrepublican.com/homepage/local_story_090000555.html


"WILMINGTON — The U.S. Army 10th Mountain Division has proposed temporary high-altitude helicopter training in April and May on top of Whiteface Mountain.

The deadline for public comment on the plan is Thursday.

Exercises would allow up to 22 total missions per week using four types of helicopters: the AH-64 Apache, the UH-60 Blackhawk, the CH-47 Chinook cargo and the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior."
 
Last edited:
http://www.pressrepublican.com/homepage/local_story_090000555.html


"WILMINGTON — The U.S. Army 10th Mountain Division has proposed temporary high-altitude helicopter training in April and May on top of Whiteface Mountain.

The deadline for public comment on the plan is Thursday.

Exercises would allow up to 22 total missions per week using four types of helicopters: the AH-64 Apache, the UH-60 Blackhawk, the CH-47 Chinook cargo and the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior."
It does not seem to state if the summit will be closed to hikers...

I sent an email inquiring about this. Will post back if I get a response.
 
Last edited:
"It does not seem to state if the summit will be closed to hikers..."

Since the road is closed at that time of year, it's quite possible that hikers traffic was overlooked!
 
If the training is restricted to certain weekdays, there should be little conflict with hikers who want to go up there. We'll see.
 
http://www.pressrepublican.com/homepage/local_story_090000555.html


"WILMINGTON — The U.S. Army 10th Mountain Division has proposed temporary high-altitude helicopter training in April and May on top of Whiteface Mountain.

The deadline for public comment on the plan is Thursday.

Exercises would allow up to 22 total missions per week using four types of helicopters: the AH-64 Apache, the UH-60 Blackhawk, the CH-47 Chinook cargo and the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior."

I hope they know the peak won't count.
 
http://www.pressrepublican.com/homepage/local_story_090000555.html


"WILMINGTON — The U.S. Army 10th Mountain Division has proposed temporary high-altitude helicopter training in April and May on top of Whiteface Mountain.

The deadline for public comment on the plan is Thursday.

Exercises would allow up to 22 total missions per week using four types of helicopters: the AH-64 Apache, the UH-60 Blackhawk, the CH-47 Chinook cargo and the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior."

Sigh. There goes my wilderness experience.

What about Bicknell's Thrush?
 
What about Bicknell's Thrush?

It did cross my mind that this is an April Fool Day article published by mistake March 31st!
 
Looks like they thought about the songbirds.
No long-term impacts
The final assessment said no long-term impacts were indicated.

"Neither the proposed action nor its alternatives would have significant adverse effects on the biological resources at Whiteface Mountain. The impact to these resources are minimized through conducting the missions from April to mid-May, when there is likely to still be snow and ice on the three landing sites identified and before the Bicknell's thrush arrive from their winter breeding areas to the Adirondacks," the Army proposal says.
 
As a retired Army NCO and one time member of the 10th Mountain Division (Fort Drum, NY) AND an avid hiker who has hiked in the Daks, I could easily see both sides of this issue. It's probably best that I leave it at that.
 
Just a view maybe from the other side of the coin. As an ex-cavalry Sergeant in the infantry and having done air-mobile operations I am surprised at what appears to be the lack of support for such an operation by the public here as a whole. Air-mobile operations are some of the most dangerous operations that combat operators can undertake especially at high altitude. Considering that these operations are to support air-mobile operations that I am certain are to eventually be undertaken in Afghanistan, I see this as a very small sacrifice to be made to try to improve the safety of difficult heli-borne operations at high altitudes.

Personally I have no issues with it and based upon the aircraft listed these are full blown air-mobile assault operations with air support probably to train new soldiers in operations in air assault and/or to keep these operators fresh in these types of operations. Pilots as well as the soldiers that are offloaded and extracted from those landing zones are trained in these types of operations.

Just my $.02
Keith
 
Last edited:
As a retired Army NCO and one time member of the 10th Mountain Division (Fort Drum, NY) AND an avid hiker who has hiked in the Daks, I could easily see both sides of this issue. It's probably best that I leave it at that.

What issue? All I see are light-hearted comments about the exercises, and not a word against it.
 
Closing the summit

It does not seem to state if the summit will be closed to hikers...

I sent an email inquiring about this. Will post back if I get a response.

Well if they are landing and taking off, I suspect they might (should) close the summit. I have assisted in a few helicopter evacuations of injured hikers from Mt. Monadnock. These evacuations were flown by the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Advanced Response Team working in coordination with the Park Rangers, the odd volunteer (definitely odd!) and sometimes NH Fish & Game and the Jaffrey Fire Department.

Based on these experiences I have the feeling that many hikers don't understand how dangerous these maneuvers are and the consequent need to maintain a safe perimeter. On one occasion that I wrote about in a previous trip report: Hordes and Helicopters on Mt. Monadnock we practically had to threaten people to stop them from walking through the landing zone as the landing was taking place.

- Monadnock Volunteer (aka Steve)
 
Last edited:
I think it's also important to remember that the summit of Whiteface isn't exactly wilderness... not only is there a road, parking lot, "castle," and summit observatory, it's zoned for "intensive use." It's one of two high peaks in the Adirondacks that are not within wilderness areas.
 
Top