WSJ article on Photo-Sharing sites

Peakbagr · Aug 1, 2007

The WSJ has a fairly detailed article today on comparisons of how the large photo sharing sites stack up: Kodak, Shutterfly, Snapfish, Flickr, and Photobucket. Pg D8.

I'm looking to be able to upload photos to a site like one of these and thought folks with more experience might like to comment on the article and provide some advice.

Thanks

David Metsky · Aug 1, 2007

Link to article

You really have to define what you want to do with online photo sharing. All the sites aren't set up to do the same thing.

-dave-

Peakbagr · Aug 1, 2007

Dave,

I'm really interested in it to share hiking photos, at least for now.
Looking to ease of use and for uploading, access by others. Would like simplicity in putting pictures up without having to do a lot of shrinking of pictures to make them fit.

Buying pictures or ordering them off the site isn't of interest to me.

I'm getting closer and closer to a DSLR, and not sure when I'll finally spring.

bignslow · Aug 1, 2007

I've never used it for this purpose (I have my own website where I store my pictures), but the picasa/google interface seems pretty intuative.

WSJ article on Photo-Sharing sites

Help Support vftt.org:

Peakbagr

Well-known member

David Metsky

Well-known member

Peakbagr

Well-known member

bignslow

Active member

Similar threads

Latest posts

WSJ article on Photo-Sharing sites

Help Support vftt.org:

Peakbagr

Well-known member

David Metsky

Well-known member

Peakbagr

Well-known member

bignslow

Active member

Similar threads

Latest posts

Join the conversation!

Join today and get all the highlights of this community direct to your inbox. It's FREE!