J.Dub
Active member
Chip said:I better be nice, at least until I'm safe back home on Monday...
Oh dear, it appears that I threaded this belay device backwards AND forgot to screw down the locking biner...
"Come fly with meeeeee......"
Chip said:I better be nice, at least until I'm safe back home on Monday...
Get used to it. I chose to leave him hanging in a cravasse for 8 hours, with a ball point pen as his only anchor. You could hear his hollering halfway to Muir.Oh dear, it appears that I threaded this belay device backwards AND forgot to screw down the locking biner...
"Come fly with meeeeee......"
Get used to it. I chose to leave him hanging in a cravasse for 8 hours, with a ball point pen as his only anchor. You could hear his hollering halfway to Muir.
Then-U.S.C.G. Commandant James Loy explained it best, in 1999, in the Coast Guard�s very similar position. �If the specter of financial reimbursement hung over the decision to report maritime distress, we could get fewer calls, we would get calls during later stages of emergencies, and more people would die at sea. This factor alone outweighs any consideration of how much money we might recoup,� said Admiral Loy.
Take driving, for example, which I think is
1. Rife with negligent behavior
2. Full of consequences for your actions
3. A leading consumer of emergency services
Suppose you were found negligent by A. Reasonable Person. How would you react then to a bill for the police, ambulance, etc.? Yes, some is covered by your insurance, assuming you have it, but not all. At what point do you draw the line for negligent behavior:
Talking to your passenger
Talking to your kids in the back seat
Handling your kids a drink, snack or something else
Breaking up a sibling fight
Nodding off on the drive home because you've been up for 24 and hiking 17 of them
Talking on the cell phone
Changing lanes without signaling
Speeding
Tailgating
DUI
Not wearing a seatbelt
...
Being that I was a BS Scoutmaster & a NE115er I was impressed with this kid - I say cut him a break.
As a long time Scouter myself I'd say a service project would be appropriate.
One other thought that keeps coming back to me per the mythical ( and no doubt, horribly boring) "reasonable person": Imagine what a dull world we would live in if it was only occupied by reasonable people? Was Bob Marshall "reasonable" when he took off on sixty mile days alone in the wilds of the ADK? Was Guy Waterman "reasonable" when he climbed the compass points of the 48K, much of it in winter? I think not.
Here is to unreasonable people everywhere - you make our world brighter, better, and a whole lot more interesting.
Let the Eagle Scout be admonished for a bad choice, if there was one, or like Little Rickie said a service project.
For us non-scouts. What's a service project?
For us non-scouts. What's a service project?
A couple hundred of hours working with or suporting search and rescue people would be a nice project or speaking to youth groups at vistor centers or at trail heads about the risks of hiking the high peaks would work too.
Service projects in place of $ for a young person can benefit the offender just as much as those served, maybe more. Money can't but that. I hope he gets a wise judge.
I daresay that a service project like this might benefit the hiking-community-at-large even more than a $25,000 cost reimbursement...
I guess Cris Colombus was an unreasonable dude.
What do we owe him?
Not much, but cannot state my real feelings about CC, as those would be politically incorrect here.
KMAC,
Not in the case of my dear friend, Ray Loring. He had a fatal heart attack during a bushwhack of Peak Above The Nubble.
Marty
Enter your email address to join: