Raymond
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2003
- Messages
- 1,536
- Reaction score
- 59
The late Guy Waterman climbed all the White Mountain 4000-Footers in alphabetical order. I'm not planning on attempting to duplicate this feat, but I'm curious: What is the proper name of Mt. Osceola's East Peak (so where does it fall, alphabetically)? Is it simply East Peak? East Osceola? Osceola Mountain, East Peak? That's probably the vaguest name of any of the 4Ks. (Does "South Hancock" actually appear on a USGS map? I don't feel like digging out my old topo to look.)
The other Waterman achievement about which I'm curious is his feat of climbing each of the White Mountain 4Ks from each of the primary points of the compass. Does anyone know exactly how he did this? Was it just "generally" from the north, east, south, and west; or did he plot out a precise starting point for each summit so that he could hold to an exact 180-degree, 270-degree, 0-degree, and 90-degree heading and hit his mark? If that was the case, he must have had to keep the compass constantly in front of him, plotting his course from landmark to landmark. Also, if this was the way he did it, how did he determine his starting point? How far out did go from the summit? The nearest trail? The nearest road? If the nearest road, he would have had a very long way to go to bag the Franconia Ridge mountains or the Tripyramids from the east, or the eastern Pemigewasset mountains from the west. I daresay that Willey might be the hardest under this scenario; from the west, he'd have to start near Echo Lake, cross shoulders of Garfield, Galehead, and South Twin, pass practically right over the summit of Zealand, then down Zeacliff, and over Whitewall. Yikes.
If he got up on the summit plateau and found himself a few paces off from the high point, then what? Start over? Or just "abandon" the bearing in order to reach the tippy-top point?
Again, I'm not harboring any desire to repeat these feats, I'm just curious about how anal he was in his own pursuit of the achievement. I'm sure he was in it for the fun, but I can't see anyone bushwacking miles and miles from tree to tree, and scaling and downclimbing cliffs, only to discover that he's off by ten feet and has to do the whole thing over again, ten feet to the right or left of where he'd just been. But maybe he did.
The other Waterman achievement about which I'm curious is his feat of climbing each of the White Mountain 4Ks from each of the primary points of the compass. Does anyone know exactly how he did this? Was it just "generally" from the north, east, south, and west; or did he plot out a precise starting point for each summit so that he could hold to an exact 180-degree, 270-degree, 0-degree, and 90-degree heading and hit his mark? If that was the case, he must have had to keep the compass constantly in front of him, plotting his course from landmark to landmark. Also, if this was the way he did it, how did he determine his starting point? How far out did go from the summit? The nearest trail? The nearest road? If the nearest road, he would have had a very long way to go to bag the Franconia Ridge mountains or the Tripyramids from the east, or the eastern Pemigewasset mountains from the west. I daresay that Willey might be the hardest under this scenario; from the west, he'd have to start near Echo Lake, cross shoulders of Garfield, Galehead, and South Twin, pass practically right over the summit of Zealand, then down Zeacliff, and over Whitewall. Yikes.
If he got up on the summit plateau and found himself a few paces off from the high point, then what? Start over? Or just "abandon" the bearing in order to reach the tippy-top point?
Again, I'm not harboring any desire to repeat these feats, I'm just curious about how anal he was in his own pursuit of the achievement. I'm sure he was in it for the fun, but I can't see anyone bushwacking miles and miles from tree to tree, and scaling and downclimbing cliffs, only to discover that he's off by ten feet and has to do the whole thing over again, ten feet to the right or left of where he'd just been. But maybe he did.
Last edited: