In-lens vs in-body image stabilization

vftt.org

Help Support vftt.org:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Good article. I have the Canon 70-300 IS USM lens and am happy with it. I think that one thing you have to also consider is the life of a digital SLR body. I read somewhere that there is a lifetime number of exposures before shutter failures start cropping up and the body has to either be replaced or rebuilt. If that's the case then having the stabilization in the lens is better. I'm also looking to upgrade my 350D to the newer 450D after they've been out there long enough to be evaluated by more people.
 
kmorgan said:
I read somewhere that there is a lifetime number of exposures before shutter failures start cropping up and the body has to either be replaced or rebuilt.
The 40D is rated for 100K shutter operations.

I don't know the ratings for any of the Digital Rebel series, but I expect that you are likely to get several tens of thousands of exposures. (A wild guess...)

Doug
 
When I got my original Rebel the rumor was 10,000 shots until the shutter was expected to give out. Looks like many people have done better than that, though, according to this shutter life web site.
 
I seem to remember reading somewhere that the shutters on my Nikon D1H and D2Hs SLRs are supposed to be good for about 300,000 shots. I wouldn't be too surprised to learn they typically fail at fewer cycles if used under very demanding and harsh conditions.

The newspaper I do work for has had the shutter replaced on at least one of its photo department D1H or D2Hs cameras in recent years, of which I am aware. I think it was surprisingly inexpensive -- a relative term. Even at a few hundred bucks the replacement was less costly than buying a new camera body for three grand.

Lens mounts also are subject to wear and damage, especially with today's large and heavy zoom lenses. They, also, are and should be replaceable.

If you use your camera hard, it probably isn't a bad idea to send it out for a good cleaning, lube job and checkup at least once a year. Same goes for lenses. If an overhaul is indicated, it may be worth getting done.

To get back on topic here, the only VR (or IS) item in my kit is a Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 zoom lens. I am frequently awed by what the VR actually can do, especially in shooting theatrical, dance or cabaret performance photos in which the lighting is less than ideal and slower shutter speeds are the order of the day. VR really does work.

G.
 
Top