hitthePeak
New member
I hope the poor girl will be found. That's why I'm afraid hiking by myself. Sometimes, it's really better to be hiking in a group so if something happened atleast someone can ask for help.
I hope the poor girl will be found. That's why I'm afraid hiking by myself. Sometimes, it's really better to be hiking in a group so if something happened atleast someone can ask for help.
Vacation these next two weeks might have something to say about that.I did the Franconia Ridge Loop today. For near perfect April conditions, there were very few people out. Definitely a drop from this time of year to the previous springs.
Fewer people.I ran into Hiker Ed on Franconia Ridge yesterday and he also agrees that he is seeing less people on the trail.
My guess is a lot of folks working from home were taking days off during the week to hike and as people are heading back to the office, they have less flexibility?
I did the Franconia Ridge Loop today. For near perfect April conditions, there were very few people out. Definitely a drop from this time of year to the previous springs.
I'm no statistician although this is a great looking graph. But it is only a subjective extrapolation that google searches directly relate to actual hiking numbers.You can use Google Trends to look at how popular hiking related searched are over time.
The graph below reviews search trends for "Franconia Ridge" over that last 5 year:
- Winter 22-23 looks to be roughly 1/2 as many searches as Winter 21-22, about the same as Winter 19-20.
- Summer '22, appears to be (30%?) more the Summer '21, but a lot less then the first Covid summer, Summer '20
View attachment 7019
I am not a statistician either, but I work with them. The statisticians that work with me on paleoclimate data would call the above attached graph an objective correlation (note, not necessarily causation) rather than a subjective extrapolation. The statistical term extrapolation would apply to projecting a trend in the graphed data into the future. The statistical term interpolation would apply to filling in missing data within the graph, not needed here. In any case, a very cool correlation and worthy of further hypothesis testing for causation, I think. I am hoping that Kimball will update this graph each year going forward.I'm no statistician although this is a great looking graph. But it is only a subjective extrapolation that google searches directly relate to actual hiking numbers.
Well explained. Good to have a professor around. Is it possible to directly correlate paleo climate data statistically to psychosocial data? Objective interpretation is somewhat questionable but possible. Always some voodoo going on when it comes to summizing statistical data. Just being the devils advocate but I was always taught to question raw data when it was crunched when it could be possibly subjectively interpreted. I only actually passed statistics in College and only because it was required for my degree. Thanks for the input.I am not a statistician either, but I work with them. The statisticians that work with me on paleoclimate data would call the above attached graph an objective correlation (note, not necessarily causation) rather than a subjective extrapolation. The statistical term extrapolation would apply to projecting a trend in the graphed data into the future. The statistical term interpolation would apply to filling in missing data within the graph, not needed here. In any case, a very cool correlation and worthy of further hypothesis testing for causation, I think. I am hoping that Kimball will update this graph each year going forward.
Funny that you mention psychosocial with paleoclimate data, as there is indeed an entire area of scientific research related to psychological impacts on people by global warming (aka, climate change).Well explained. Good to have a professor around. Is it possible to directly correlate paleo climate data statistically to psychosocial data? Objective interpretation is somewhat questionable but possible. Always some voodoo going on when it comes to summizing statistical data. Just being the devils advocate but I was always taught to question raw data when it was crunched when it could be possibly subjectively interpreted. I only actually passied statistics in College and only because it was required for my degree. Thanks for the input.
That is what potentially happens when politics gets mixed with artificial intelligence.Funny that you mention psychosocial with paleoclimate data, as there is indeed an entire area of scientific research related to psychological impacts on people by global warming (aka, climate change).
There was a time when one‘s mention of paleoclimate on this board could get one suspended. Ask me why I know that.
Enter your email address to join: