linehant said:
provides a very good overview of the entire WMNF showing all of the roads and trails. If my memory is correct, the new map even shows the trails on Moosilauke.
Agreed, it would be an excellent map for redlining.
linehant said:
is a TRAIL map, NOT a topographic map. There are no contour lines on the overview. That makes it easier to read and orient oneself relative to, say, Rte 16 or Rte 302, but less useful for detail work.
I agree that it is not a topographic map but I don't know why not having contour information makes it easier to read and orient. When I look at contour lines I get a picture of the terrain. I
know what a mountain looks like and the valley, from where I am standing. I look at the trail and I
know what it is going to be like climbing or descending. Sorry, I
need my contour lines. Even on a "trail" map.
linehant said:
provides small inset maps with contour lines for Franconia, Crawford and Pinkham/Northern Presi.
I like my whole map to be like that.
linehant said:
For those individuals who are already familiar with the Whites and who own the entire series of maps provided in the White Mountain Guide, the new map will probably not offer much advantage.
I agree again, and it doesn't provide me with any advantage, so I didn't buy it. I didn't say the map was no good. It doesn't fulfill any need of mine.
linehant said:
OTOH, I occasionally work the info desk at Pinkham and found the map very useful in talking with folks who are new to the area and who don't have a sense for where the mtns and trails are located (which is probably 70% of the traffic at the info desk). Most of those individuals don't know a contour line from a geographic meridian, so the exclusion of the topographic info from the overview is not a disadvantage.
I understand this and agree again. There is a large segment of the "hiking community" that doesn't need a real map or know how to use one, and this would do fine.
linehant said:
For a detailed discussion about specific hikes in the Northern Presidentials, I invariably refer to the Washburn map. The detail on that thing is unsurpassed.
Now that is a real map.
For $10 dollars ($9 if you are a member), if it is the only map you are going to buy and you are only ever going to stay on the trail, it is probably a cheap way to get around in the whites. If you want a map to hang on the wall for a quick overview or redlining it is good also. Again, this is just my $.02.
YMMV, FWIW, I understand others may have other belief systems or ways to do things etc. etc.
Keith