Actually, I've spent too much time looking at maps (how many people have reviewed every topo map covering the state of NH?) and just got the sequence of events confused. The bottom line is the same: Bondcliff is on because it only has one iffy col and Guyot is not because it (now) has two.RoySwkr said:Sorry Eric but you need to spend more time looking at maps. On the old map
http://docs.unh.edu/NH/frcn32se.jpg
Guyot had one definite YES and one definite NO which disqualified it. When the new maps first came out only definite peaks (Galehead) were added with possible (Bondcliff) added later and "possible but improbable" (Guyot) put on 3K list only.
Unless they were favorites of Club officials and left on anyway. Maybe the new 4K board will finally banish S Hancock which if the map is correct is definitely disqualified.
The "prominence" newsgroup has built a number of mathematical models on likelihood of col depth but the average from contours is a good approximation.
Eric Savage said:Actually, I've spent too much time looking at maps (how many people have reviewed every topo map covering the state of NH?) and just got the sequence of events confused. The bottom line is the same: Bondcliff is on because it only has one iffy col and Guyot is not because it (now) has two.
South Hancock fails by only a foot and judging by the quality of the trail in that area, it won't be long before we can all agree again