Papa Bear
New member
A small side discussion in the thread on Trail Bandit's new (and I might say very excellent) map of the Ossippee Mountains concerned the name Kearsarge which is used for two mountains well known to hikers and climbers.
Some time ago when I was searching the old records for the survey work done by Professor E. T. Quimby in New Hampshire in the 1870s led me to discover the following extract from the 1877 Annual report of the United States Coast Survey (which later became the Coast and Geodetic Survey which later became the National Geodetic Survey).
The old annual reports are available on the NOAA web site (NOAA is the parent agency of the NGS) here: Coast Survey Annual Reports.
This particualr report is located here: CS Annual report for 1877.
Here's the title page:
And here's the section of interest. Note the discussion of the two Kearsarges in the second half of the text. It was clear that someone in the USCS really wanted to "get it right" and went to a rather in-depth study of the historical record, going back some two hundred years, to the mid 17th century. He was mindful that information, once published in a government report, would have a tendency to take on an air of truthfulness and permanency (something much more so now that we have the WWW, except perhaps the "truthfulness" part ).
The text speaks for itself. Enjoy.
Some time ago when I was searching the old records for the survey work done by Professor E. T. Quimby in New Hampshire in the 1870s led me to discover the following extract from the 1877 Annual report of the United States Coast Survey (which later became the Coast and Geodetic Survey which later became the National Geodetic Survey).
The old annual reports are available on the NOAA web site (NOAA is the parent agency of the NGS) here: Coast Survey Annual Reports.
This particualr report is located here: CS Annual report for 1877.
Here's the title page:
And here's the section of interest. Note the discussion of the two Kearsarges in the second half of the text. It was clear that someone in the USCS really wanted to "get it right" and went to a rather in-depth study of the historical record, going back some two hundred years, to the mid 17th century. He was mindful that information, once published in a government report, would have a tendency to take on an air of truthfulness and permanency (something much more so now that we have the WWW, except perhaps the "truthfulness" part ).
The text speaks for itself. Enjoy.
Last edited: