"It's become an attractive nuisance," said park spokesman Scott Gediman. "If there's a fence there and some reason to go over there they will."
What to do with this large chunk of the popular Yosemite lodging area has been an issue since October 2008, when the equivalent of 570 dump-truck loads of rock hit 17 cabins where youngsters on a field trip were staying.
It seems that Yose suffers from analysis paralysis as it appears some do here
Is this type of thinking pervasive at Yose?
It appears the people in charge have a plan. Educating tourists and not placing any more warning signs because they want to keep the park wild.
I doubt it. They are much more likely to be saying that barriers don't stop everyone. (Barriers, however, probably reduce the total injury rates.)I think we established the fact that 2 of the 3 folks swept over the falls ignored warning barriers 50 or so posts ago.
What I find more interesting is a statement in a recent article about the rock fall that smashed cabins in Curry Village at Yosemite. They have installed temporary barricades around the damaged buildings.
So they are acknowledging that barriers don't do any good at keeping people out. Duh"It's become an attractive nuisance," said park spokesman Scott Gediman. "If there's a fence there and some reason to go over there they will."
Or perhaps it is just a slow and funding starved bureaucracy acting like a slow and funding starved bureaucracy...The article goes on to say:
What to do with this large chunk of the popular Yosemite lodging area has been an issue since October 2008, when the equivalent of 570 dump-truck loads of rock hit 17 cabins where youngsters on a field trip were staying.
3 years later and they still haven't done anything about an area labeled "major risk to public health and safety for visitors, as well as park employees who patrol the site."
It seems that Yose suffers from analysis paralysis as it appears some do here
A remarkably thoughtful and evenhanded article on the record number of deaths in Yosemite this year.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/06/u...ths leaves out some important factors.) Doug
Bob, how is the thread getting silly? Just curious as to what you are referring?
"People make poor decisions for a lot of reasons," said Kevin Killian, deputy chief ranger. "What it comes down to is a lack of clarity in peoples' risk assessment. What is the true hazard and what are my bailout options?"
Craig, I just read this article and thought of your position on this subject:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/half-dome-survivors-heed-14696074
"After the fact I realized it's the wilderness and they're not supposed to do anything, but I did go in expecting a little more of a warning," said Castillo, who plans to return."
...but then I can't get past that over 8 miles of walking, it never occurred to someone "how the hell would I get out of here?"
I definately felt that way at first, (and have softened up a little),
Enter your email address to join: