A Direttissima attempt

vftt.org

Help Support vftt.org:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

peakbagger

In Rembrance , July 2024
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
8,639
Reaction score
689
Location
Gorham NH
https://www.wcax.com/2020/09/01/managing-the-white-mountains/

Wow hauling 10 days of food adds some effort. Many attempts and near attempts in the past were scheduled around the summer solstice to take advantage of long days. The trade off usually was brutally hot weather which was the cause for some attempts ending. Doing one this time of year requires warmer heavier gear and more days on the trail or a lot of headlamp hiking which means more batteries and more weight. No doubt the initial pack weight along with recovering from an ankle strain is going to be an issue in the first few days.

Best of luck to him.
 
I saw this on WCAX as well. Best of luck to him! Definitely a lot to carry, although thank god the bugs are gone and it's not very hot. I would love to try this someday.
 
Rich Gamble just started his 4th. He's looking to go sub 8 days, unsupported.
 
Rich Gamble just started his 4th. He's looking to go sub 8 days, unsupported.
Does anyone ever do this and just take their time? I remember reading an article in Appalachia Back in in the 80’s of one of the first recorded Direttissimas. I believe the gentleman did it as a series of day hikes over an extended period of time. He always picked up where he left off from the previous hike. I always thought that if you had plenty of time to just do one of these at a leisurely pace say over the course of a Month or six weeks as a combination of day and mostly backpacking trips would be inspiring. In other words take your time and stop to smell the roses.
 
Does anyone ever do this and just take their time? I remember reading an article in Appalachia Back in in the 80’s of one of the first recorded Direttissimas. I believe the gentleman did it as a series of day hikes over an extended period of time. He always picked up where he left off from the previous hike. I always thought that if you had plenty of time to just do one of these at a leisurely pace say over the course of a Month or six weeks as a combination of day and mostly backpacking trips would be inspiring. In other words take your time and stop to smell the roses.

That's not how its done. The whole point is that it is continuous. At least that is my understanding.
 
That's not how its done. The whole point is that it is continuous. At least that is my understanding.
Only if you are doing it unsupported. Here is a bit of info I dug up from the archives: A bit of history since I think it is important: The first Direttissima, “most direct route,” was actually completed in 1970.

In the context of the NH 4’s, the idea was hatched by Reverend Henry T. Folsom, who in the December 1971 edition of Appalachia defined the endeavor as climbing the 4000 footers in the most direct manner using only trails and roads, starting at one end and walking all the way to the other. Rev. Henry began his quest on June 18, 1970, on Mt. Cabot and finished with Moosilauke on September 3, hiking 19 non-continuous days toward his summer’s goal. Returning home most nights, he also spent 4 nights camping out plus a night at Galehead Hut. Including off-route miles, Henry hoofed a total of 258 miles to complete his Direttissima.

One does not have to carry everything from the start unless they are pursuing an unsupported/self-supported Direttissima
 
Phll Werner proposed an alternative a few years ago. I cant remember the details but I think staying at AMC huts was okay. I think Mats formalized the unsupported concept on VFTT.
 
People are using the term for several different but related things. Mats specifically did unsupported single push (plus push-ups on the summit) and was the first in modern times to resurrect the idea. Phil Carcia did single push but supported.

Sounds like three attempts going on at once right now. Wow. I've met BK doing trail work; he's a pretty neat guy.
 
For those that find the details interesting. Rich Gamble is carrying 25 lbs. of food and 22 lbs. of gear for is unsupported attempt at sub 8 days.
He stated he " likes to eat and have extra gear".
 
People are using the term for several different but related things. Mats specifically did unsupported single push (plus push-ups on the summit) and was the first in modern times to resurrect the idea. Phil Carcia did single push but supported.

Sounds like three attempts going on at once right now. Wow. I've met BK doing trail work; he's a pretty neat guy.

The term actually originates from Alpine Climbing and has been adapted for the White Mountains of New Hampshire. Like many of these games it's about splitting hairs and creating rules for fun. Which IMO leaves room for one to create and interpret within one's own imagination. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direttissima_(climbing)
 
What makes something "unsupported"? skiguy asked if anyone ever takes their time. So if someone cached halfway through because they would take too long to be able to carry all their food, what adjective would apply? "self-supported"? "Supported" doesn't seem quite right.
 
Generally in the "Fastest Known Time" world, they define "unsupported" as without any external support; that is, other people helping. You may only make use of publicly available resources. So for example, you can fill your bottle at the spring by Garfield Shelter, but you can't buy a piece of blueberry bread at Galehead Hut.

However, suppose you want fill your water bottle at the Hut, where water is free: if you regard the AMC huts as a "commercial enterprise" then your effort isn't unsupported; but if the huts are a non-profit organization (and not commercial, like a gas station selling water bottles), then it would still be unsupported. I am not sure how they adjudicate use of this resource.

A cache falls under "self-supported" -- unsupported would have no cache; and supported would mean something like, others drop the cache for you.

I think that in addition to the rules of the website that lists these efforts, there is also the idea that the initial record-setter can determine some details (such as, particular trailheads). There is also the consensus of the community.



I'll copy in the entire text from the FastestKnownTime dot com website -- once independent, but now owned by Outside Inc.:
https://fastestknowntime.com/guidelines

Styles​

There are three levels of support, called styles. Each route may have separate gender categories for these three styles, and FKT submissions must state which style was employed. While these three styles are different from each other, none is better than the others; do what works best for the route and you.

Unsupported​

Unsupported means you truly have no external support of any kind. You must carry everything you need from start to finish except water from natural sources. Public taps along the trail are fine, but no water from any commercial source even if free. This naturally limits the length of an unsupported trip. Spectating pre-arranged by an athlete is supportive, and was classified as support starting February 4, 2021. All FKT classifications previous to this date remain unchanged. Phone and digital communication is not considered support, nor are spectators and support people at the start and finish. Using public restrooms is not considered support, though using it as extended sheltering would be. Charging digital devices or headlamps at public power sockets is acceptable for unsupported attempts.

To be unsupported, all equipment and gear must be carried from start to finish. Wrappers/Trash (not gear/clothing) may be properly discarded along the way. One may drop gear (such as a pack while summiting a peak) if one returns to it and brings it back to the finish on the same trip. Using a bike or kayak can be unsupported if the above condition is met, such as on an out-back route where a bike is ridden from the start, left temporarily, and ridden back to the finish. If a bike or any other gear is cached in advance or left along the way, the effort is not unsupported.

Self-Supported​

Self-Supported means you may have as much support as you can manage or find along the way, but not from any thing or person just for you; any support you employ must be equally available to anyone else. This can include caching supplies in advance, purchasing supplies along the way, staying at motels, and finding or requesting food or water. Camping in a friend's yard would be supported, because it is not available to the public. Except at the start and finish, spectating pre-arranged by an athlete is considered support. Many long thru-hiking routes are done self-supported. To get a self-supported FKT you must also beat the fastest unsupported time.

Supported​

Supported trips can have as much support as you can enlist, as long as you are entirely self-powered. This can range from one person accompanying you for part of the run, to an entire team that runs with you the whole distance giving you everything short of physical assistance. Whether it’s just once or continuously, any support at all means it’s a supported trip. On many routes, the supported style can enable the fastest trips due to the ability to carry less weight. To get a supported FKT you also have to also beat the fastest self-supported and unsupported times.

Groups and Teams​

Groups of people can employ any of the three styles as long as they all travel and finish together; a team may share gear and still be unsupported. However, if one member drops out that means they paced the other members, so the finishers will automatically be supported. Speaking and traveling with strangers you encounter by chance does not count as support. Running with a dog is not considered support.

Motorized travel and Equipment​

All FKTs are self-propelled, though variations of certain routes allow a motorized vehicle to link significant features or to cross water or other obstacles. Use of motorized transport can never be considered unsupported; if an athlete drives, e-bikes, hitchhikes, takes public transit, or uses rideshare apps for off-route logistics (or linking features where specified in certain variations), the effort can be self-supported. If someone you know drives you it will be supported. Certain routes have a strict ethic of exclusive foot travel for self-supported records, even for off-route logistics; when this is the case, it will be stated in the route description (e.g. the Pacific Crest Trail).
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top