DougPaul
Well-known member
I think so too. I wasn't advocating, just reporting an extreme example of the short window. Many of us use the same window, although we don't generally push it as hard. But if for some reason we become immobilized high up, the altitude effects could become serious.Kevin Rooney said:Doug - I think 19 hours was pushing it as well, especially given the height differential.
Even more extreme, but with more preparation (longer than the window): Messner did Everest in 3 days from 21Kft, solo and with little food and drink after 6 weeks of pre-acclimatiztion. His description suggests that he was ataxic (balance problems) and hallucinating (farily common at high altitudes) on the way down. (Some of us can be ataxic and hallucinate at sea level... )
A very interesting and useful experience. AMS is common, and I expect mild HAPE to also be common at the speeds at which climbers ascend. Most acclmatize or descend before they become serious, but not all.I had the good fortune on my first climb of Rainier to have a physician in our group who had been to altitude many times. As he listened to each of us breathe/talk/cough (we were stormed in at 10K for a few days) he would occasionally comment on what stage of HAPE he though we might be in. It was a real eye-opener, and have been grateful for what he taught us. Have used it many times to monitor myself and others.
A quick ascent to 10K does certainly put you in the zone in which problems are not all that uncommon.
<speculation> The above window may simply be due to time required for HAPE and HACE to develop. </speculation>
Doug