Anyone good at identifying animal skulls?

vftt.org

Help Support vftt.org:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I think it's coyote. Does this seem to match ?
Coyote_Skull-sm.jpg
 
I vote coyote or a dog.
Why is it on the tree trunk? Is there some kind of occult activity in that area?
 
Looks to rounded for a canine. Bear maybe? My little brother has several bear skulls on his barn wall, they are smaller than you would think. Unfortunately he does not have a computer or I would send this to him to compare.
 
Puck said:
I vote coyote or a dog.
Why is it on the tree trunk? Is there some kind of occult activity in that area?

I've found a number of skulls in the woods, mostly deer. I always stick them
on a broken branch as high up as I can reach. It's sick, but it makes me laugh.
It'll come back to haunt me one day, I'm sure. You know, late arrival at camp,
setting up tent solo, I look up... :eek: :)
 
I didn't think it was a dog or coyote (nor wolf), when I saw the incisors in the front view and what seem to be molars in the side view, but now I'm having second thoughts. It turns out coyotes and foxes do have incisors, and their back teeth look enough like molars that you can't tell from these pictures.

My first thought was bear (obvious ominivore), but bears have forward-pointing canines with a gap between them and the next teeth - this skull has a gap in front of its canines where a coyote's lower canines would fit [bears have that gap too but it's less visible from the side due to the shape of the jaw].
I'm changing my mind and voting coyote or fox.

bear skulls

Canid skulls (coyote, fox, etc)
 
Last edited:
Thanks all for your help

I now have some direction to go searching (I was thinking man-eating rabbit :D ). One link I found shows a good variety of canid skulls. reproductions



Puck said:
Why is it on the tree trunk? Is there some kind of occult activity in that area?

Better to take a picture? Or like a glove it's easier to found by it's owner. ;)
 
A better measurement shows it to be 4 1/2 - 5 inches, so I'm thinking fox.
 
Chip said:
I agree. I wonder why skulls don't rot or get eaten like the rest of the animal.
They are recycled by natural processes including dissolving by acids and chewing by rodents. Otheriwise, the woods would be paved with bones.

Doug
 
DougPaul said:
. Otheriwise, the woods would be paved with bones.

Doug

Sounds like my backyard after buffalo chicken wing/beer night
 
DougPaul said:
They are recycled by natural processes including dissolving by acids and chewing by rodents. Otheriwise, the woods would be paved with bones.
Doug
I understand. My question was why more skulls in the woods as opposed to finding nothing or the entire animal. I guess skulls are harder.
 
Chip said:
I understand. My question was why more skulls in the woods as opposed to finding nothing or the entire animal. I guess skulls are harder.
OK. Perhaps more bone mass in one chunk. Also leg bones contain marrow and are worth breaking to get at it. Teeth (much harder than bone) are the real long-term survivors--consider how many fossils are teeth.

Doug
 
Top