Somehow, I think the people who live in the area and depend on hikers for income that potentially will be affected for the next decade by this event might disagree.The upside of this is that it provides a great opportunity to do some volunteer trail clearing and reconstruction.
Seems likely, though also very possible that with some of the storms and declarations of disasters that it may be easier to relax or work around those rules that apply under "normal" conditions.I don't even think it's very easy to volunteer for trail work. After hiking Grafton Loop this year, I thought perhaps next summer I would clean up the trail a bit. I looked into how I could do that, and it's not easy to do if you want to follow the rules. First off, no chain saws without some special training, which requires also having other training like first aid. Also, no trail maintenance without being a member of MATC and taking some kind of multi-day trail maintenance course, or volunteering to go out with a trained crew. Except, they are not accepting volunteers at the moment, because of something to do with a housing shortage? Anyway, I'll either go ahead and do it "off the record", or I guess give it a pass.
Now maybe it's easier to volunteer down south? But I would assume AT committees would likely have similar rules.
Volunteers can be more of a liability than they are worth. Not that they are not needed, but from the article, it will take professionals to move a lot of the trees. The last thing they need down there is unskilled volunteers getting hurt and putting additional strain on local resources. With all due respect, it's a footpath, there are more pressing issues in that area to be dealt with.The upside of this is that it provides a great opportunity to do some volunteer trail clearing and reconstruction.
Enter your email address to join: