DougPaul
Well-known member
blownaway said:The comment regarding the possibility of developing a lethal infection is a little dramatic but DougPauls case does have plenty of merit...
Just trying to point out the trade-offs...
In town, one can usually change shoes and there is little reason for draining the blister. (It will deflate on its own if protected.) On a hike, first choice is to prevent the blister in the first place (tape, moleskin, etc), second choice might be tape, moleskin or "moleskin with a hole in the center" on the blister, third choice (or if the first and second don't work well enough) might be draining. But draining is not risk-free, requires steady maintenence, and the consequences can be severe if professional medical help is not available.
There are a bunch of "modern" remedies, but these are being advertised by companies trying to make a profit. I would like to see a relatively objective medical evaluation of them including a comparison to the traditional methods.
There is also a tendency of some sources to give one solution for all occasions--there are a number of possible treatments and, IMO, it is better to select the most appropriate depending on the situation.
BTW, Grover Cleaveland's son died of a blister... (in the pre-antibiotic days)
Doug