I apoligize for the closed minded comments I made earlier and have since deleted. I have these two bad habits that sometimes either get me in trouble and/or make me look like a fool, 1) I think I know everything (about everything) and 2) I like to argue (and be right).
So, on the debate of sit and switch versus not, I still think not switching is the better choice, and I may never be convinced otherwise. HOWEVER, I went to the library today and checked out several Cliff Jacobson books and did some reading on sit and switch, otherwise known as "the Minnesota Swtich". I thought it was intersting to note in the books, that in those sections the authors (not always CJ) noted that "old school" paddlers will disagree about this technique saying it is ugly and ineffiecient bla bla bla. So that made me feel a little better. I am not really old school, because I am too young, but I was taught the "old school" techniques and therefore have that mentality.
I am not looking to further the debate as to which is better, but rather acknowledge that there are different strokes for different folks
. I will stick to my methods and SARdog can stick to his. Diffent techniques work for different situations, different boats and different paddlers. So, in the end, I maintain agreeing on disagreeing and it appears to be widely agreed to disagree as well, and I agree.
Since I deleted the post that had my book recommendations, here they are again- if you wish to learn non-sit-and-switch techniques.
Paddle your own canoe by Gary and Joanie McGuffin
And anything by the ACA, CRCA (aka Paddle Canada) and written/filmed by
Bill Mason.
Anyway, I apologize for being a jerk- somebody should have red squared me!