DougPaul
Well-known member
OK. It is possible that the points of a Stabilicer might be more predictable and less inclined to roll underfoot on slanted ice. I was pleasantly pleased (perhaps even surprised) with the French Technique performance of the Stabilicers, but the points were pretty new and the temp wasn't too cold so the ice might have been a bit soft.I found that micro-spikes are not nearly as reliable on the type of rock you describe even using the French technique. They will fail on hard ice, imo. I find that MS work better on soft ice, if its very cold and icey, I'm in crampons, as a soloist I do not trust MS under those conditions.
Microspikes are pretty dull--only sharp crampons work well on hard ice. Ice climbers have been known to carry a file with them in case the points need a touch-up or get dulled by bashing them into a rock. In contrast, I have seen hiking crampon points that were effectively 1/8 inch diameter hemispheres...
Doug