mavs00 said:
Please take this message in the spirit it is delivered. I am not meaning to be preachy. THANK YOU.
Signed, Mavs00, (a fellow climber)
----------------------
I am presenting this message publicly for two reasons. 2) it was brought to my attention that way. And 2) If I got any part of the message wrong, other members smarter than I can add to it. REMEMBER, the goal is education, not castration.
Spongebob,
Please re-read my initial statement. Not sure if your critical words are directed at me or not. The initial post, which I hesitated to write because I knew that MANY people were angry about the event, and the potential for ugliness was ripe. I choose to go ahead, because the message was important (IMO). I made a DELIBERATE attempt to state that the objective here was education, Not chastation (and by default, embarrassment or public condemnation). The assumption was that because the transgression was blatantly posted in several locations, it was more likely a "Whoops, sorry folks we did not realize" situation than anything else.
I'm a "glass full" kinda guy and give the benefit of the doubt first. I don't apologize for it. The debate was initiated on another forum and was posted here simply because incident was presented here first. I thought a public "please don't do this" was as measured and benign as you could get.
With that said, I am very disappointed with your post. Primarily because, in this situation, the persons involved have made contact both
-HERE- and
-HERE- (which is better, but still a hostile tone in general). My fear is that reading this thread, given his responses so far, he'll read your post as tacit approval from some of the hiking community, and that only a few of us "wingnuts" that perhaps are off base. I beleive that is the wrong message to send.
Irregardless of anyone's personal feelings for a particular mountain or path (I recently b-whacked Fishing Brook #4 and if I had my druthers, I'd nuke the SOB out of existence), it is never appropriate to do harm to live trees in any effort, heinous or otherwise. NYS thinks so too, as the activity is
ILLEGAL (see §190.8 part G). Which states;
g. No person shall deface, remove, destroy or otherwise injure in any manner whatsoever any tree, flower, shrub, fern, moss or other plant, rock, fossil or mineral found or growing on State land, excepting under permit from the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation and the Assistant Commissioner for State Museum and Science Service, pursuant to section 233 of the Education Law as amended by chapter 121 of the Laws of 1958, nor shall songbirds and their nests and other wildlife be molested or disturbed at any time, except during the open season therefor, if any
The penalty is $250 per tree (plant). Others, upset with the response have taken it further, which is there right. Personally, I just don't ever want it to happen again.
Sorry, you feel the way you do (Spongebob), and I've always enjoyed reading your witty post and contributions. This time, however, I am disappointed the condemnation isn't universal and the message clear (your post leaves room for doubt).
Perhaps, I'm reading your message wrong, but if I am, so may others be. I expect post this will be my last on the matter.