Double Bow said:
I spoke to someone this past weekend who uses one and they said that they like it but that it's no good unless you sleep on your back and that it's tricky to get into. Are these things true?
I experimented with one for a few hours, returned it, and got a Speer.
Getting in and out is easy enough. The problem for me came when I added a pad and sleeping bag to the mix. The pad covers the entry slit so you have to push it out of the way for entry and egress and then once you are in, you have to adjust the pad and sleeping bag back into position (while you are on top of them). And of course, one would also have to deal with wet shoes in many real situations. Would have made a late-night visit to the woods a bit of an ordeal...
As for sleeping positions, I found the end of the entry slit made a hard spot that became uncomfortable after it pressed on my leg for a while. If I laid in just the right position, I could avoid it but it did limit my sleeping positions. Don't recall if I could have slept on my side, but the asymmetrical shape could easily limit one to sleeping on one side only. (The asymmetrical shape limits one to sleeping on only one diagonal.)
In contrast, the Speer Hammock (
http://www.speerhammocks.com) is a symmetrical top-entry design. (The mosquito netting velcos on at the edges and the rain fly is a separate 8x10ft tarp.) One can position the pad and bag and then just sit on top, take your shoes off and stow them, get in the bag, and fasten the netting. Easy in and out. The symmetrical shape gives one the option of sleeping on one's back (on either diagonal) or on either side. Unlike the closed Hennessy design, the open design also gives one a place to throw stuff when packing and unpacking. And the separate rain tarp gives one a shelter to work under when outside the hammock. (And, of course, the tarp can be used without the hammock.)
I think the Hennessy design is clever and a little lighter than the Speer design. But I also think the Speer design is more practical.
Doug