Gris
New member
If the reporting is accurate, then what a bizarre trial!
First it says the Judge "ruled that the teen's actions were a 'gross deviation' from what a reasonable 14-year-old hunter would do..." Oh really, what is the standard for the mythical 'reasonable 14-YO hunter?'
Then it says the Judge "acquitted the boy of the more serious charge, finding he didn't act recklessly. But she says it wasn't a hunting accident." How could he have not been reckless? He shot a person! And, it wasn't an accident? You mean he did it intentionally...?
Even more insane - "The boy's defense attorney said 'At the moment he took the shot, he knew it was a bear.'" "And his older brother said, 'Indeed, it was a bear.'"
Apparently, the participants in this trial were from another planet.
First it says the Judge "ruled that the teen's actions were a 'gross deviation' from what a reasonable 14-year-old hunter would do..." Oh really, what is the standard for the mythical 'reasonable 14-YO hunter?'
Then it says the Judge "acquitted the boy of the more serious charge, finding he didn't act recklessly. But she says it wasn't a hunting accident." How could he have not been reckless? He shot a person! And, it wasn't an accident? You mean he did it intentionally...?
Even more insane - "The boy's defense attorney said 'At the moment he took the shot, he knew it was a bear.'" "And his older brother said, 'Indeed, it was a bear.'"
Apparently, the participants in this trial were from another planet.