Kevin Rooney said:
With all due respect to Dr_wu002 - one of the derived benefits of doing lists is that you get to see more mountains, more views, more trails, more whatever as your focus is on 'the list du jour'. Without 'working on a list' the tendency is to think you've climbed more different mountains than you actually have. For example - when I finished the NE 100rd Highest and realized that the 111 goal was within reach, I was quite certain I was at least 1/2 way thru the ADKs because I'd hiked there alot. Wrong! When I sat down with my hiking logs, I realized I'd climbed Marcy 7 times, Algonquin 4, etc., and that in reality all I'd climbed were 6 unique peaks of the 46 'counters'. I believe my experience is representative.
Just because I say I'm not doing the 'lists' doesn't mean that I have not memorized basically all the NE US lists (NH48, NE67, NE100, NH100, ADK46, Fifty Finest, NE111/115, 55 peaks w/ 2000' prominence etc.) and am well aware of what I have and have not done on them. While I am nor pursuing completion of any of these lists as a specific goal, I plan on finishing them all as a matter of course. I love the mountains and I want to visit them. I do however, find the lists (particularly NH48, ADK46) constricting in that it takes an incredibly worthy mountain like Hancock in NH and reduces it to North and South Peak (and maybe Middle) which in my mind is a shame -- there's a lot more to explore there. It works for some people but it's frustrating for me -- I want to go to North West Hancock, East Hancock, The Captain, Hitchcock, Huntington, North of Northwest Hancock, Crystal Ravine, climb the Arrow Slide, Cedar Brook Slide, the various slides in Crystal Ravine, as well as explore the various logging roads that cut into the slopes of the mountain. For me, going up the Loop Trail and down all but eliminates the majesty of this mountain. This holds true for lots of the other peaks on the lists and it's why I've sought to make my own 'list'. Don't though, think for a moment, that I'm not well aware of "where I am" on the various lists.
Kevin Rooney said:
Again, in deference to Dr_wu002: My schedule permitted me to hike twice a week, year-in, year-out. That means it's quite easy to do 2 complete rounds of the NH4's each year. So - did I ever get bored doing Eastern peaks? No, but one does hunger for other 'peak' experiences in other parts of the country and world.
YMMV ...
Kevin
Again, I didn't mean just the established lists which we've seen can be done in 3 days and change!
I meant taking the North East (including Canada) as a whole. I want to move away some day but I also love it here. I think that the NE US 3K's (including NY peaks) would keep you busy for quite a while. Try doing the 3K's from all 4 compass directions. As for some real exploration, I think that a lot of the peaks on
this list are traveled a whole lot less than the mountains out west and from what I can see, they are quite majestic as well. I understand what you're saying but I think that with a little trying, you could keep yourself quite busy without ever doing the same trip twice!!
But then again, I'm likely to do Crawford Path 4 or 5 times a year because I love it so much. Then again, it never is the same trip twice.
-Frank Bock (Dr. Wu)