Huntington & South Huntington Bushwhack

vftt.org

Help Support vftt.org:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

docross

In Memoriam to a Deceased Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2004
Messages
136
Reaction score
28
Location
Concord NH
Yesterday was a perfect day to work on my winter NH HH, and Fred Shirley and I had a great trip to these peaks off the north side of the Kanc.

A group of us had attempted the peaks in October after the bad storm that dumped a foot of wet snow and caused numerous blowdowns. We found then that the Hancock Notch Trail was completely impassable beyond the Cedar Brook junction, so we abandoned our attempt to go up the slide on the north side of Huntington col.

Yesterday the snow conditions were very different, after all the rain and warm weather we've had. The snow base was about a foot deep, and highly compacted, but still required snowshoes to avoid postholing. Blue skies and temps in the 20s made for good conditions.

We started at the 2500 foot level on the Kanc, near a convenient pull-off (not a true parking lot) located on the south side of the road, about 150 yards from where we entered the woods.

And enter the woods we did! The first 100 yards were very thick with fir, and we just had to bull our way through. We headed west toward the drainage, and broke out into the open. You can see a map of our track at my website, under GPS tracks.

We headed on a bearing of 045 deg mag. toward the col, but finding open spots kept leading us left toward the drainage as we ascended. The drainage was always more open than the surrounding ridges, and as we went up, we found we were heading directly toward the main peak (on the left).

We did go through a few bands of thick stuff, and a stick forest on the summit cone, but the summit itself was open, and we easily bagged the bottle, which is a glass pickle jar. Because of internal condensation and freezing, the plastic bag required some effort to remove from the jar, but we succeeded and signed the log, which is a fairly new one.

We then headed down the col, again looking for open spots, and we found them. It was easy going except occasionally, and heading for the left (north) side of South (?Middle ?East) Huntington's long flat summit, we spotted the bottle almost immediately, this time a plastic Jif jar with a red cap. There was a jar with a yellow cap nearby, without a register.

After signing the register, we headed south of west, hitting some gnarly stuff until we came upon our footprints. After that it was just a matter of getting down to the road.

We had great, but limited, views of the Osceolas on the way down. The trip took us 5:20 total, leaving us plenty of time to head to Lincoln for a latte on the way home. :D For me, #86 and #87 in all-seasons.
 
Congrats to you Docross! I'm hoping that Eric (Barbarossa) is planning a trip to Huntington soon. Sounds like you had perfect conditions -- conditions which, somewhat hopefully (we need more snow!!), probably have changed by now.

-Dr. Wu
 
Huntingtons

Docross,
My understanding is that there are 2 main Huntington peaks, with equal elevation of 3700'. E. Huntington is a subsidiary peak which qualifies as NH 3000' and actually has registers at both ends of the ridge but the sign is at the western end. Then there is W. Huntington, a separate peak of about 3400' elevation, included in the NH 3000' list. Using your GPS did you find the elevations of the 2 central peaks to be equal?
 
The main Huntington peak and the south peak of Huntington are virtually the same elevation, I have made two trips to both, and using my Thommen altimeter, both times the elevations were a shade under 3700 ft. The recognized summit on East Huntington is on the western summit bump. There is a sign and a register there. There are also some very nice views looking north. The west peak is scrappy and viewless. However if you bw south a bit off this summit there are some fine ledges with nice views to the south.
 
Last edited:
Will the REAL Huntington please stand up?

Both peaks registered as 3700' on the GPS and altimeter. The one I thought was "Main" Huntington is at N44.03.024, W071.29.477, while the other one, which is southeast of the "Main", and connected to it on the topo by a dashed line (which we didn't see Sunday :p ) is at N44.02.807, W071.29.094.

http://community.webshots.com/user/docross2243 is a link to my website, and in the GPS tracks album, the Huntington bushwhack track should clarify which peaks we did.

This brings up the question of which peaks really count for the NH 100 Highest. Depending on whose list you use, the answers are somewhat different. My understanding is that there is *NO* officially sanctioned list for the NH 100 Highest.

ON the topo there is an peak to the east marked 3306, which is probably the true East Huntington that HikerDoc refers to as a NH 3000 footer.
 
The lists for the NH 3ks, NH 100 and 200 Highest were the work product of Gene Daniell, John McHugh, Roy S., Dennis Crispo and others who spent many hours studying the USGS maps. Basically a labor of love for those involved.
 
Last edited:
dms,
When I decided to do the NH 200 highest in the 90's, I took the previous list that Anne Gwynne had and modified it according to most recent USGS data. When SnowLeopard and I went back and finished this list in winter in 2003, we again used my list. There are now 2 others who have completed the NH 3000' in winter and are working on the 200 highest in winter, using my list. The differences between this list and Gene's list are minor but important.
HikerDoc
 
docross said:
This brings up the question of which peaks really count for the NH 100 Highest. Depending on whose list you use, the answers are somewhat different. My understanding is that there is *NO* officially sanctioned list for the NH 100 Highest.

ON the topo there is an peak to the east marked 3306, which is probably the true East Huntington that HikerDoc refers to as a NH 3000 footer.
The AMC does not recognize any NH 100 list, but there are several variations and a guy who will sell you a patch if you finish any of the serious ones

Both of the 3700' peaks may be on a NH 100 list as there is a 200' col between on the new map, but not on the 15' one and some people don't count marginal peaks on new maps if they didn't count on old ones

As for the E peak, the westerly point with the spot elevation may be the traditional summit but there are noted peakbaggers who disagree, need visit with altimeter
 
RoySwkr said:
some people don't count marginal peaks on new maps if they didn't count on old ones
Roy, my rule is to climb them all! New list, old list, marginal, I don't discriminate I want them all! More places to visit and enjoy!
 
RoySwkr said:
The AMC does not recognize any NH 100 list, but there are several variations and a guy who will sell you a patch if you finish any of the serious ones

Just about all the NH HH baggers I've talked to are using lists with slightly different variations in the last 5 or so peaks. I am also using a list I received from Anne Gwynne; the last 5 are Clough, Fool Killer, Captain (Carrigain Pond Peak), Sable and Savage.

The next 7 (101 to 107) are Unknown Pond Peak, Chocorua, Hitchcock (South Peak), Scar Ridge (Middle), Wolf, Dixville, and Kelsey. :confused:
 
grouseking said:
A few more facts from wikipedia .
I fixed an error on that page, my first wikipedia work

At least one NH 100 list includes Mt Kelsey as #100 because it eliminates some marginal peaks higher up
 
Top