Chip said:
How many hours, days and nights, miles etc. on the trail, above tree line or in winter conditions does it take to graduate from "Rookie" status ? Does this have to be recent experience with modern equipment ? Or were you indicating that even experienced hikers can make "Rookie" mistakes ? Thanks. Just curious.
I’m not so sure you can use milestones such as miles, years, days, nights to make a judgment on when you pass that invisible line from rookie to veteran. Professional guides pass a series of tests and some serve apprenticeships in order to become qualified and age or years of experience don’t really enter into the equation. More experience does not necessarily move you from rookie to expert. If you read enough books and magazines on climbing, you’ll be amazed at how many ‘experts’ have died from making rookie mistakes. On the other hand, there are as many stories of rookies who have made miraculous recoveries and have escaped death by the slimmest of margins, sometimes saving the veterans in the process.
I would say that you need to look at a person’s ‘body of work’, just as you would evaluate a candidate for a job. Twenty years of experience does not necessarily make you a better candidate than a person with ten years of experience. Chances are you’ll learn more from a day of winter hiking in a fierce storm than you would in an entire season of hiking on sunny days. It is not teh amount of experience that is important; it is the quality of the experience.
Then you have the intangibles; heart, willpower and luck. Why do some people die when the person next to him lives? It is difficult or impossible to quantify these sort of qualities that end up saving one life and taking another.
I think someone alluded to it earlier in this thread. There are so many variables and there is so much changing in a situation such as happened to Mssrs Osborne and Fredrickson. You have to be prepared, think ahead, evaluate alternatives, react appropriately. Plan, Do, Check, Act. Repeat.
JohnL