The photo you’ve chosen certainly would be improved by some cropping off the top. It also apparently can use some color tweaks as noted above, and some other adjustments, which may be done where/when you get the print made.
Now …
Looking through your shoot, I’m drawn to some of the frames with fog on the water. They have what I think is more dramatic light on the mountains, as well as the moodiness of the fog.
Also, I’m drawn to the shot labeled “Last,” which employs foreground framing tricks that (to my eye) add extra interest.
I don’t know if the frames you’ve shared in your photo album constitute the whole shoot of this scene. If they do, I recommend that you shoot more when tackling a subject like this, using different focal length lenses, working through the changing light, and moving around to explore framing options. I particularly recommend trying longer focal length lenses on scenes like this when the goal is to emphasize the mountains (or other features) in the distance. You might also play with exposure adjustments and filtration, contrast controls, etc.
In other words, really “work” it to explore many possibilities and build a greater array of choices when it comes time to edit. Memory to record images in the digital age is inexpensive, physically compact and reusable, so there is little or no economic or other excuse to not shoot more frames.
After all, consider the time, effort and other resources expended getting to places where you can see nice scenes like this one. The cost of recording digital images is next to nothing by comparison (once camera and lenses are paid off). Why not make lots of shots to improve the chance of coming home with something extra special?
G.
)
