Waumbek
New member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2004
- Messages
- 1,890
- Reaction score
- 209
Clown said:With all due respect, but where do you get this information? Is this experience, if so where and for what? Because everything that I have learned/experienced with suicides contradicts most of your statement. Again with respect, because I am curious.
The authority in this field is William Syrotuck, whose Analysis of Lost Person Behavior is a classic. The profiles that Sardog and SAR-EMT refer to accurately summarize Syrotuck's findings. Yes, Syrotuck considers despondents who are also "lost persons," and his data are meant to give searchers a profile of the different categories of lost persons, e.g., children (age specific), hikers, fisherman, hunters, alzheimers patients, etc., and to predict how they got lost and how to find them. For instance, hikers are heavily trail-dependent, of course, but often have poor map and compass skills, so if the trail becomes unclear from missing signs, blowdowns, etc., hikers are likely to have gone missing there. There are certain patterns that hikers will follow to get themselves found again as well. That's true of all the groups Syrotuck describes. Children, for instance, may evade being found for fear of punishment, for fear of the strangers they've been taught to avoid, etc. Searching for children thus involves looking for them hiding under fallen trees, etc. For despondents who are not lost persons, other profiles no doubt exist. The difficult issue is to know whether an apparent despondent fatality is not in fact a hypothermia victim, one who became so disoriented and mentally confused that he or she set up a camp right near a trail rather than walked out.
Last edited: