alexmtn
Member
So sad when one's pursuit of what he/she loves turns into a tragic loss for family and friends. A tradeoff I think about often. For the pleasure/fun/satisfaction it's likely to yield, what level of risk is acceptable in the context of those we love?
A friend and I attempted this hike in December, and were turned back near the top of the bypass route by a descending (below the table lands) cloud ceiling and 60-80 mph winds. Knowing that we're planning to have another go at it, all in our circle who learned of the accident have been urging us to reconsider. In the course of the related conversation and associated thinking, I've concluded that if you encounter ice and/or crust that's set to ensure that a slip is going to send you down beyond just the next boulder/ledge or two, ice ax or not, then it's simply not safe to continue without a rope and protection -- turning back is the only logical course. We either keep coming back until conditions are acceptable on the route, or we carry the extra gear.
Absent a technical approach, in those conditions all it takes is one slip. Given this mountain passion we all share, most all of us find ourselves in a just-one-flub setting with some frequency. The distinction to make is: at those times, are we vulnerable for a well-defined, well-considered step or two, or for hundreds of steps over a period of hours? The former entails a lot less risk than the latter.
Alex
A friend and I attempted this hike in December, and were turned back near the top of the bypass route by a descending (below the table lands) cloud ceiling and 60-80 mph winds. Knowing that we're planning to have another go at it, all in our circle who learned of the accident have been urging us to reconsider. In the course of the related conversation and associated thinking, I've concluded that if you encounter ice and/or crust that's set to ensure that a slip is going to send you down beyond just the next boulder/ledge or two, ice ax or not, then it's simply not safe to continue without a rope and protection -- turning back is the only logical course. We either keep coming back until conditions are acceptable on the route, or we carry the extra gear.
Absent a technical approach, in those conditions all it takes is one slip. Given this mountain passion we all share, most all of us find ourselves in a just-one-flub setting with some frequency. The distinction to make is: at those times, are we vulnerable for a well-defined, well-considered step or two, or for hundreds of steps over a period of hours? The former entails a lot less risk than the latter.
Alex