Sherpa John said:
Sorry if this re-ignites discussion but again.. I felt these points very alid to the conversation and thought they should be said in anonymity. Also.. I appologize to seema for using the memory of her ascent in this way.
Thanks for the extra dose of double talk, John. You are not sorry to re-ignite this discussion, but rather its exactly what you want. If you didn't want to keep this conversation going, you would have let this thread died out after it reached a very ammicable conclusion. But you have to prove yourself right no matter what, and you want to hammer your point in and hope that people stop responding. Well, I'll bite, mostly because I still think you are wrong.
First off, posting personal emails in a public forum is a major faux-pas. Those emails were sent to you in confidance, off-thread, for a reason. I realize that you did not share the names of those people, but if they wanted their comments to you made public, they could have done it. Poor form, IMO.
Second, the comparisons of Sarah's hike to Seema's hike are apples and oranges. Seema never set out to set a "record", you did. This was the source of misunderstanding. Seema invited anyone that wanted to join her, and ended up with 32(?). You stated from the outset that you wanted to break that number instead of taking a similar path. This reason, and ONLY this reason, is what caused this discussion - it has nothing to do with a YOU vs. Seema issue that you seem intent on pursuing.
In fact, you have since retracted your intention to set a "record" on the summit. Immediatly after that, everyone dropped their objections. A few people (myself included) even said that we might join you guys on your hike. So why bring this back up again? This issue was resolved, at least I thought it was. Instead, you are implying that people like Seema and look the other way at her hikes, while people don't like you and are more critical of your endevors. This is not true.
Finally, as for welcoming SherpaK to the "stick up for SJ" crowd - maybe you should re-examine your posts and wonder why exactly it is that you need such a crowd.
In closing, I don't want this to be taken as an anti-SherpaJohn post. I was at the first showing of '48', I think that what you are trying to do is admirable, and I think that Sarah's accomplishment deserves more than this type of post. However, I think that your interpretation of people's opinions on this thread is not correct.