dr_wu002
Well-known member
To be honest, Henry Clay was kind of a douche. I think I can get away with saying that without evoking the "no politics" thing on the site because he existed so long ago at this point that I don't think it'll turn into a heated debate on whether "Henry Clay was a douche or not..."I still call Pierce, Clinton, I do not like that change either ( although in a thread today I used Pierce for a beginner to not confuse him) name changes mean little to me I just ignore them, I will always refer to Clay as Clay regardless, I hope people asking me for directions if this goes through understand that. ...............
Without getting too political, I'm not a huge fan necessarily of Ron Reagan and I used to oppose the name change but recently I've flip flopped. Henry Clay seems arcane and meaningless as long as you don't bother retaining the Native American names or even really know or care who Clay was. But at least.... polarizer or not.... Ron Reagan is a modern name, and I'd actually like to see a dude from the 80's get his name on the summit. The 80's freakin' ruled, man.
Perhaps an alternate idea is this: Rename the presidentials every 4 years. The Washington summit peak gets the current president's name (Obama) then the successive peaks would be previous presidents: Adams = GWB; Jefferson = Clinton; Madison = Bush Sr; Monroe = Reagan and so on. That would mix things up a bit! Oh, and rename Ball Crag each time to be the current Vice President. Is everybody on board yet? We could have a Mount Nixon in the Presidentials at least for a little while!!
-Dr. Wu