On my first ever night hike I did that quite a bit because the drainage with all the sand and dirt looked more like the trail then the trail did....until it dead ended in a wall of bushes.Was with my daughter recently, who has never been much of a hiker. I laughed at the amount of times she followed a water bar into the woods before I gave her a head's up. I explained why they are there, etc. and even admitted I followed one that went into several yards and got myself lost, too. It happens.
I've only ever hiked in small groups or by myself. I've never hiked in a small group where each person didn't hike at their own pace at least some of the time, which naturally leads to spreading out on the trail. We always tend to stop at any major intersections or points of interest and regroup. I don't recall this ever leading to a potential problem. Do other people actually stick closely together the entire day as a rule?
While I tend to exclusively hike alone, (using a self assessment protocol reliant on experience, state of mind and ability to adjust to "no mistakes" best practices), I prefer to group up. Groups tend to have varying skill and ability levels, so it seems most logical to divide into smaller groups, but no one should ever be left alone, out of sight and/or earshot. Logistically it makes the most sense that the fastest hikers go in front but that backcountry experts go last, and that regular regrouping happens at intersections or tricky route finding periods. I would also suggest that limiting groups to 10 or fewer lessens impact on the nature and other parties.I've only ever hiked in small groups or by myself. I've never hiked in a small group where each person didn't hike at their own pace at least some of the time, which naturally leads to spreading out on the trail. We always tend to stop at any major intersections or points of interest and regroup. I don't recall this ever leading to a potential problem. Do other people actually stick closely together the entire day as a rule?
I think you made the right choice to "get out". I reccomend only following leaders that understand supporting the weakest in the group is their obligation and take pride in that. If timing becomes a concern, pushing weaker hikers too hard is more likely to result in accidents that can significantly extend the duration of the outing. Good leadership will account for adjusting goals to reduce risk.I used to belong to a couple Meetup hiking groups that did, or tried to, but the hike leaders tended to have thru-hiker builds and paces and basically said “too bad. Keep up.” when those of us who didn’t go 2.5+mph complained. So we tended to split into 2 groups that saw each other for short times at rest stops, summits, and parking lots. I did enough fast hiking (as in 5-6mph or faster) in the army, I’m not hurrying for anyone when they’re going way faster than the 1.5-2mph pace stated in the group description. When I asked why they wanted to go so fast instead of enjoying the trail, taking pics of interesting things along the way, etc, they said “so we can be finished before dark.” (Most of my hikes with them were in winter.) I brought up the fact that the group rules required certain pieces of equipment, such as headlamps, so why was finishing before dark so important? That’s when I found that most people do NOT like hiking at night. I love it, and have often started hikes after dark. A couple hours of nighttime cross-country snowshoeing is a 2-3x weekly thing for me in winter. So I gravitated away from groups and toward just 1 or 2 hiking partners with similar mindsets. One’s wife didn’t share that mindset, though, and both of us got in trouble regularly. The time I talked him into hiking Chocorua on a well below 0F March day was probably the worst, she was afraid they’d find our bodies sometime in June and was probably HOPING that would be the case for me LOL
I think you made the right choice to "get out". I reccomend only following leaders that understand supporting the weakest in the group is their obligation and take pride in that. If timing becomes a concern, pushing weaker hikers too hard is more likely to result in accidents that can significantly extend the duration of the outing. Good leadership will account for adjusting goals to reduce risk.
The hiking gods are fond of irony.I got turned off on any kind of meet up group hike a while back when the guy who was supposedly leading the hike was not there to lead when the hike was supposed to start. After waiting awhile the rest of the group decided to go. Ironically only about 5 minutes in to the hike the so proclaimed leader came by announcing himself from the rear and stumbling fast to pass everyone only to fall on his arse and totally sprain his ankle. We carried him back to his car. That was definitely the first and last meet up hike I showed up for.
Guilty of that myself. Sooooooo guilty....Was with my daughter recently, who has never been much of a hiker. I laughed at the amount of times she followed a water bar into the woods before I gave her a head's up. I explained why they are there, etc. and even admitted I followed one that went into several yards and got myself lost, too. It happens.
Enter your email address to join: