Musquash (ME)

vftt.org

Help Support vftt.org:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

buckyball1

New member
Joined
May 18, 2005
Messages
426
Reaction score
62
Location
Orrington, ME
With all the in & out weather in Maine and lots of wet woods, i decided about 11 this morning to take advantage of some rays of sun and do something small/easy, just to get out.

Musquash 1250+'(means muskrat i think?)--up Rt 95 from Bangor, off the big road, into Lincoln, onto Rt 6 and east through Lee and Springfield toward Topsfield. I enjoyed the ride. It's an area of Maine I've not visited; open, nice feel and pretty empty. Just before Topsfield and near Musquash Lake, I parked at the base of Tower Rd (unsigned) and headed up the road. It's a decent, steep dirt road and I'm sure the Forester would have been OK right to the summit. However it is called hiking.

The woods surrounding me were soaked as was the asphalt on Rt 6, but i had the best weather of the day-abundant sun with light wind, scudding clouds and 60 degrees. The top of Musquash is festooned with communications towers, five of them. There are also a number of utility sheds and abandoned cinder block buildings. I was surprised to find a dilapidated fire tower with an unusual look. The cab was square(looks trashed), but it's roof was round. The trees have grown to obscure the summit view so i decided to try the tower. Well....it's not in good shape and in a different area would have already had the lower steps pulled for safety. The treads on the steps are heavy gauge open "diamond" mesh connected to small pieces of angle iron on the stringers-- many steps are badly bent, close to broken. This seemed "OK" as i ascended the first flight, but about flight 3-4, I realized how tenuous my handholds were and that i'd probably drop straight down if a step failed. I went a bit higher while placing my feet on the edges of the steps over the angle iron support, but upon reaching landing 2?, I'd had enough. Fortunately i was high enough to have a terrific 360 degree view of an area I've never seen--rolling hills, many lakes, scattered population-easy peek across the border.

Uneventful descent and ride home--was able to get some info about a gate (DeLorme) that I though would block reasonable access to another peak in my sights--it's only closed for mud season :)

-a nothing day had turned into an enjoyable afternoon

jim
 
Last edited:
That firetower is one of 2 in the state of Maine that was rebuilt with reinforced steel so that they could house a radar station. That ring on the top of the steel cab used to hold a radar radome. It was removed years ago.

There is another identical tower with an intact radome on Number 9 mountain up in Township E in Aroostook county.

Add that to your useless trivia list :)

Bill
 
Bill--ah, had a nagging "feeling" in the back of my mind, but thought this was the first top like that i'd seen--forgot about the one on #9 a few years back--these hills really do blend together after awhile-not sure when you were on Musquash, but the tower is getting a bit ricketty

Roy-- sure i noted the two bumps with same # of contour lines and decided the "x" on the northern most bump on the USGS topo was the correct call--not much of a student of different maps/groups//interpretations on calls like this (don't even know the Board of Geographic Names) and will stick with USGS call --i wandered around a bit and there was a path from behind the SWmost tower which looked decent and lead toward the other bump--maybe 0.3ish miles away

j
 
Last edited:
Roy-- sure i noted the two bumps with same # of contour lines and decided the "x" on the northern most bump on the USGS topo was the correct call--not much of a student of different maps/groups//interpretations on calls like this (don't even know the Board of Geographic Names) and will stick with USGS call
The X means spot elevation, and only indicates that the USGS thinks the elevation at that point is whatever and says nothing about where the summit is. If you look at the following map neither the 4508 on Mt Guyot nor the 3854 on Zealand Ridge are at the highest point of those peaks - they're not even within the highest contour

http://mapper.acme.com/?ll=44.18085,-71.52984&z=14&t=T

If you have been following the Mt Kinsman discussion there seems to be general agreement that the bump with the spot elevation is lower than the one with the cairn and survey marker
 
Hi Roy---the "x" on Musquash doesn't appear to be a random spot elevation "x", but is inside the last (highest) contour on the north bump--same # of contours on the south bump on that map--- another topo shows higher contour lines on "north"-suspect it'd take some serious work to make the call, but......

i also have a pretty extensive beta copy of the ME300' prominence peaks (over 1300 of them) which i'm using for this little adventure and it looked as it the lat/long #s for Musquash were right on for the bump i hit (north), which is why i didn't head over to south--not saying this is definitively "correct", but.....glad someone's interested in these

jim
 
Last edited:
Top