Nate said:
in addition to John Person and Dennis C., I imagine at least a few more people are darn close to completing. If the FF hasn't had a fifth finisher yet, there will be one by the end of June, if not much sooner.
Well, there are 22 more NE3k finishers who are only a couple of weekends away, but after a list of 451 a list of 50 may seem too short to bother with
And I hear that DC is waiting for one more finisher so he can be #6
> what's number 51?
Perhaps Adams Mtn VT
> And how many of the second fifty peaks are under 3k?
Maybe a couple dozen, there are 1 or 2 under 2000'
> Were there any surprises when putting together the second half?
There were plenty of P1k peaks in New England I'd never heard of, even a couple in NH
>Just in general, when generating a list like this, is using Topozone a
>reasonable method, or is it much better to own hard copies of the
>topographical maps so that you have the whole area physically in front
>of you?
At current prices you probably cannot afford enough hardcopy maps to do the job right as you also need the low country maps for col elevations. I did most of the Northeast at map libraries which also had larger tables than I had at home but even if you can find a vacant gymnasium some of the ranges are too big at 1:24,000. Until topozone increases their scan resolution, there will always be some areas that need to be detail checked in hard copy but you probably need some sort of base map to visualize large areas.
For Pennsylvania, I didn't own any quads and no local libraries had them so I looked at the maps online. I went to the public library which had larger monitors and a faster Internet connection than I did. Basically, I traced the ridgelines on a DeLorme Atlas noting summit and col elevations, and would run branch lines to anything to the side that had several contours. I also ran spur lines to every county highpoint that wasn't on a main ridge. I could only do this for about 45 minutes at a time before my eyes got fuzzy and as I only went once a week the project stretched over a year.
> Do you simply end up calculating the prominence for all New
>England peaks above 2500', and from there figure out which are the
>most prominent?
You will miss a lot of them if you do that
But seriously, the first list of SE P2k was fairly accurate with respect to the high peaks but left off some outlying "molehills" that no hiker had ever heard of.
And it isn't that easy to determine the prominence of peaks individually as the col next to a certain peak may actually "belong" to a more prominent peak somewhere else - a col near Rte.110 in Berlin NH is not the col for Long Mtn but rather for Sugarloaf in ME. Having a graphic diagram of summits and cols makes it easier to pair them up.
If anyone wants to undertake a listing project, a prominence cutoff of 1400' should yield just over 100 peaks in New England. From another viewpoint, there are something over 200 peaks with 1000' prominence in New England and sooner or later somebody will climb them all. (I only did 2 last year so it may not be me.)