spider solo
New member
I was reading todays article 3-29-07 in the Union leader that Pittsburg Nh is facing the prospect of low flying military jets buzzing overhead at 500 ft.
The article features a picture of jets flying through the Pemi.
-NO POLITICS-
I know we can't let the disscusion drift into politics so the question is ...
DO you already plan your hikes in relation to the expected noise pollution on a given hike ??
Would you give up on an area that is often used as a place buzzed by jets, airplanes etc?
if for example if we were talking military jets as oppsed to other kinds the word military could only be used as a discriptive adjective not some kind of policy statement, either good or bad
to start off...A few years back while hiking the Sandwich wilderness I spent the majority of the day listening to jets buzzing the area. I found the deafing noise somewhat overwhelming. It was at least 5 years before I ever even thought of returning to the area.
The noise pollution does not have to based solely on air traffic.
for example I know that in the White mnts I sometimes pick a trail that goes along a brook or waterfall knowing that even though I'm near a road it will drown out the traffic noise.
Just wondering if other people already do much the same ..ie avoiding trails where you might be listening to snowmobiles all day ,might be another example.
Though the consideration of the noise pollution might seem excessive to some people.
I would use the Grand Canyon as an example. It is often cited as having an impact to the enjoyment of the area now that there are so many sight sighing air traffic there. (I have always felt the Whites were lucking in that respect.
I know up in the north country I would give up on travelling, camping there if it means jets buzzing over at 500'
So would noise pollution change your hiking habits ??
The article features a picture of jets flying through the Pemi.
-NO POLITICS-
I know we can't let the disscusion drift into politics so the question is ...
DO you already plan your hikes in relation to the expected noise pollution on a given hike ??
Would you give up on an area that is often used as a place buzzed by jets, airplanes etc?
if for example if we were talking military jets as oppsed to other kinds the word military could only be used as a discriptive adjective not some kind of policy statement, either good or bad
to start off...A few years back while hiking the Sandwich wilderness I spent the majority of the day listening to jets buzzing the area. I found the deafing noise somewhat overwhelming. It was at least 5 years before I ever even thought of returning to the area.
The noise pollution does not have to based solely on air traffic.
for example I know that in the White mnts I sometimes pick a trail that goes along a brook or waterfall knowing that even though I'm near a road it will drown out the traffic noise.
Just wondering if other people already do much the same ..ie avoiding trails where you might be listening to snowmobiles all day ,might be another example.
Though the consideration of the noise pollution might seem excessive to some people.
I would use the Grand Canyon as an example. It is often cited as having an impact to the enjoyment of the area now that there are so many sight sighing air traffic there. (I have always felt the Whites were lucking in that respect.
I know up in the north country I would give up on travelling, camping there if it means jets buzzing over at 500'
So would noise pollution change your hiking habits ??