Overnight Hiker Rescue Conducted On Mt. Washington

vftt.org

Help Support vftt.org:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Thanks for posting but does not give a whole lot more insight. It is too be seen if the actually went by the entrance of The Jewel on their way over to Summiting or not on Jefferson. Might have been good to have inspected the entrance on the way by if not actually wanding that entrance for the return.
Don't a lot of people cut that corner coming back from Mt Jefferson? I suspect that is a very sketchy endeavor in the right conditions. The few times I've been up there and did the extra distance to head back on the official trail. I have a thorough respect for spruce traps.
 
I'm sure I've brought this up before and no doubt someone yelled at me then too but I never really bought into turn around times and rigid, time based goals. I've never used them at any point in my hiking "career" either now or as a newbie. The concept that some absolute time decided on at home or in the parking lot never made sense to me. I hike alone most of the time but even when I hike with a friend it's pretty much the same process. I suppose in large groups it needs to be a consideration. I feel like most people use a turnaround time specifically just to get out of the woods before dark (and in many cases probably because they don't carry a light source).

Until you are actually out on the trail, observing the conditions and getting a sense of your overall stamina, mental state and physical condition, determining what is or isn't doable seems very arbitrary. I always went off my gut feel of how I was feeling relative to the potential risk of what I was undertaking. Being knowledgeable and prepared greatly influences this decision making. This is an ongoing process revisited many, many times throughout the day, not something you decide at a specific time on a watch. I'll significantly lengthen or shorten a hike quite often, and the time of day rarely hasn't anything to do with it. (And when it does it usually involves prior plans back in civilization or maybe a good craft beer).
If that version of navigation works for you so be it. I'll say one thing. If you're going Solo like it sounds like you do most of the time. At least there is only one body to drag out if it doesn't work out.(insert smiley Face). What's decided at home is not set in stone. I set some TATs and TAPs in advance at home but are easily adjusted if the situation warrants. I live less that hour from the trailheads within this incident and not hours away in Conn. It makes for a better out the back door assessments of what conditions are like. I also like making an itinerary on place and time as it makes it easier for my back up contact in the event of an incident.
 
Last edited:
Don't a lot of people cut that corner coming back from Mt Jefferson? I suspect that is a very sketchy endeavor in the right conditions. The few times I've been up there and did the extra distance to head back on the official trail. I have a thorough respect for spruce traps.
Yes, I cut that corner all the time, IF (big IF) the snowpack is deep enough to cover the spruce and has enough structure to keep one afloat in snowshoes to not fall in, like what happened to Naomi Watts in “The Infinite Storm.” In my Jefferson hike described above, the snow was deep but had gone isothermal by mid-March when I was there so had lost its supporting structure. I view judging spruce trap potential the same way that I judge avy conditions, with a lot of data and careful introspection.
 
What's decided at home is not set in stone.
Exactly. The situation is always changing. I could arrive at my "mandatory" 1PM turn around time and:

1) Decide to continue and have one of the best days of my life in the mountains and get out of the woods later than planned.
2) Decide "it's time", turnaround and take a horrendous fall 10 minutes after starting to head back, leading to a life or death struggle.

The time is irrelevant.
 
The time is irrelevant.
I’ll disagree with that but to each his own. Feel free to contact the two Women in this situation swimming in the dark while in neck deep snow well within the raging hell of the crumholz after dark and see what they think. Personally I would think a few more hours of daylight would have been welcome.
 
I'm sure I've brought this up before and no doubt someone yelled at me then too but I never really bought into turn around times and rigid, time based goals. I've never used them at any point in my hiking "career" either now or as a newbie. The concept that some absolute time decided on at home or in the parking lot never made sense to me. I hike alone most of the time but even when I hike with a friend it's pretty much the same process. I suppose in large groups it needs to be a consideration. I feel like most people use a turnaround time specifically just to get out of the woods before dark (and in many cases probably because they don't carry a light source).

Until you are actually out on the trail, observing the conditions and getting a sense of your overall stamina, mental state and physical condition, determining what is or isn't doable seems very arbitrary. I always went off my gut feel of how I was feeling relative to the potential risk of what I was undertaking. Being knowledgeable and prepared greatly influences this decision making. This is an ongoing process revisited many, many times throughout the day, not something you decide at a specific time on a watch. I'll significantly lengthen or shorten a hike quite often, and the time of day rarely hasn't anything to do with it. (And when it does it usually involves prior plans back in civilization or maybe a good craft beer).
I am with you and rarely have used turn-around-times, as long as I am ok mentally and physically, as I do not mind hiking after dark, which is a given in SAR missions,

In my first winter hike with the famous John Swanson (first to hike the 770, early wNortheast 111/115 and wNHHH, etc), three of us got a late start on Abraham in Maine after their late arrival in Stratton following an AMC-led trip to the Bonds, IIRC.

There were supposed to be far more than the three of us, but the others bailed after their long hike and drive the previous day. The third member of our group had shorter legs than John and I, so the two of us did all the trail breaking in very deep untracked snow. The old cabin was pretty much buried in snow except for the upper part of the front door.

Being a longtime NJ/NYC AMC leader, John had a turn-around time that caught up with us when we were still well below tree-line. For the next hour, I kept prodding him to push back our turn-around time until we reached tree-line, when I knew that summit fever would kick in.

I had not been on Abraham’s summit previously but John had and recognized the fire tower wreckage in the dark to know that we were on the summit. Our better-rested, shorter-legged companion blew us into the proverbial dust on the descent, arriving at the trailhead a good half hour ahead of us. Very glad that we did not turn around on this summit as it was long drive to get there.

Ps, John later rationalized that because I was there and the others were not, our hike was no longer a sanctioned AMC trip, in which case we would have been bound to the turn-around time.
 
Last edited:
I’ll disagree with that but to each his own. Feel free to contact the two Women in this situation swimming in the dark while in neck deep snow well within the raging hell of the crumholz after dark and see what they think. Personally I would think a few more hours of daylight would have been welcome.
Yup, agree with this perspective. Wish that we knew whether they were on their way back from Jefferson, or whether it took them that long to flank Washington (not mentioned as an objective) on the Westside Trail before getting entangled in the spruce traps.
 
I’ll disagree with that but to each his own. Feel free to contact the two Women in this situation swimming in the dark while in neck deep snow well within the raging hell of the crumholz after dark and see what they think. Personally I would think a few more hours of daylight would have been welcome.
I would respectfully disagree. The weather was the issue, not the darkness or the time.
 
Good discussion on TAT and TAPs. I think the idea is that it's better to establish these things when at home and thinking clearly and without the complications of summit fever and/or reduced mental capabilities and or wishful thinking. Having said that, I don't ever have a completely rigid TAT/TAP set, just a roughly loose idea. Also, I love hiking after dark as well and used to do it all the time before I was married and had kids. But now they worry if I'm not out before dark, even when I tell them ahead of time that I have big plans and I might not be out before dark. So I do try to be out before dark in general and therefore do use TAT a little more rigidly than in the past.
 
No problem being out after dark. But I don’t subscribe to hiking in a snow storm, traveling and not knowing where I am after dark. Only proper preparation primarily time management would avoid that for me. That being said secondarily a better chance of being in those conditions with daylight therefore increasing the chances of better visibility and a better chance of finding identifiable land marks. Has anyone experienced after dark conditions with snow falling and blowing while driving or hiking? The reflective nature of lighting that exists in those conditions severely reduces the distance of how far one can see.
 
I could not get the Messner brothers on Nanga Parbat out of my mind during my two-hour slog from the Caps Ridge parking lot back to my vehicle at the Cog station. And this recent debacle by the two women getting stuck in spruce traps on the upper Jewell Trail did much to confirm to me that I made the right decision in my descent route from Jefferson.
Just curious. Did you use the Boundary Line Trail or just stay on the roads?
 
Don't a lot of people cut that corner coming back from Mt Jefferson? I suspect that is a very sketchy endeavor in the right conditions.
The only times I've been able to "cut the corner" is at the end of a snowy winter, and conditions have been able to form a thick crust. Otherwise, it's chest-high krumholz and nearly impossible to navigate. It's also a LONG way from the col on Jefferson to where the Jewel Trail re-enters the woods. Otherwise, it's faster to take Gulfside (I think that's the name of the trail) around the shoulder of Clay to the Jewell.
 
The only times I've been able to "cut the corner" is at the end of a snowy winter, and conditions have been able to form a thick crust. Otherwise, it's chest-high krumholz and nearly impossible to navigate. It's also a LONG way from the col on Jefferson to where the Jewel Trail re-enters the woods. Otherwise, it's faster to take Gulfside (I think that's the name of the trail) around the shoulder of Clay to the Jewell.
Yah I wasn't suggesting a complete corner cut from the col. That sounds like a nightmarish endeavor. See attached photo. What I meant was that spot where you can see the cairns on the Jewell Trail from the Gulfside Trail but the Gulfside trail continues North for maybe 1/4 mile or so to the official junction only to back track all the way, almost like a switchback. Every Winter I've been up there I see tracks heading into the scrub to cut the corner in different places. Always seemed like a bad idea. Once or twice I cut across the 60-80 ft section between the two trails because I know it is grass and rock, no scrub, but that is about as much as I'm willing to take on.
 

Attachments

  • Gulfside_Jewell.jpg
    Gulfside_Jewell.jpg
    121.3 KB
Top