spencer
New member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2003
- Messages
- 1,483
- Reaction score
- 194
MPBN released the story this morning. It's not in the Bangor Daily News yet.
Roxanne Quimby and Tom Gardiner swapped lands in a terrific deal
1) Gardiner gave Quimby 10,400 acres in T4 R8
2) Quimby gave Gardiner 14,000 acres in T5 R8
3) they are using the E. Branch as the boundary so Quimby now has T4 R8 and T5 R8 west of the river and Gardiner has the eastern side.
4) this will allow the IAT to be rerouted through the woods
5) there was no mention of T3 R8 where Katahdin Lake lies
6) the swap gave the Bowlin camps to Quimby
Both were quoted in the news bit as saying this was a good deal for every party and it was only possible b/c many of the other interested parties left the table. The last year or so has seen tough negotiations b/c there were too many people trying to work together (state, NGOs, etc.). Once they pared the parties down it worked out. This was the first time I've heard Roxanne really acknowledge the need and ability for multiple interests to share the forests adjacent to each other. Both parties really emphasized that they can co-exist cooperatively.
This is good news, folks! Now how about T3 R8?
My other big question as all this unfolds is how does the park feel about the likelihood of extended trail networks into Quimby's abutting land. I for one and for creating no new trails and letting that area serve as the true buffer it was intended for.
spencer
Roxanne Quimby and Tom Gardiner swapped lands in a terrific deal
1) Gardiner gave Quimby 10,400 acres in T4 R8
2) Quimby gave Gardiner 14,000 acres in T5 R8
3) they are using the E. Branch as the boundary so Quimby now has T4 R8 and T5 R8 west of the river and Gardiner has the eastern side.
4) this will allow the IAT to be rerouted through the woods
5) there was no mention of T3 R8 where Katahdin Lake lies
6) the swap gave the Bowlin camps to Quimby
Both were quoted in the news bit as saying this was a good deal for every party and it was only possible b/c many of the other interested parties left the table. The last year or so has seen tough negotiations b/c there were too many people trying to work together (state, NGOs, etc.). Once they pared the parties down it worked out. This was the first time I've heard Roxanne really acknowledge the need and ability for multiple interests to share the forests adjacent to each other. Both parties really emphasized that they can co-exist cooperatively.
This is good news, folks! Now how about T3 R8?
My other big question as all this unfolds is how does the park feel about the likelihood of extended trail networks into Quimby's abutting land. I for one and for creating no new trails and letting that area serve as the true buffer it was intended for.
spencer