True, but one of the main reasons that the negligence debate is gaining steam in the NH legislature is because they want to make it easier to charge people for their rescue, not to reduce the risk to SAR. So, in the context of costs passed on to taxpayers, it's a fair comparison.
REPLY:
I think the two are quite interconnected. Having the knowledge that you have to pay a hefty fine just might deter some individuals (definitely not all) from behaving in a negligent manner, thus reducing the need for so many rescues.
The article really described in great detail how dangerous these missions are to the rescuers. Money often talks when nothing else does, especially if you know you won't be driving any time soon if you don't pay up!