2024: Leas snow than normal

vftt.org

Help Support vftt.org:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Sorry, I have a Ph.D. I simply cannot be bothered to take the time to respond to silliness like this.
This is what these arguments always boil down to...I'm smarter than you...you are ignorant. I'm pretty sure that Ph.D has nothing to do with hard science.

These arguments serve no good purpose other than to get people pissed off at others. Nobody is going to have their opinion changed. Nobody. The ham radio forum that I frequent has an absolute prohibition on politics...no exceptions. There are zillions of forums where people can voice their political opinions.

This board should be for the exchange of information by hikers who share a love of the outdoors and especially hiking in the Northeast.
 
So go seek the snow while you can. Or make it.
I worked in Jaffrey, NH this week and on FRI I took the back roads home past Wachusett. I was shocked to see patches of snow on some the slopes from snowmaking efforts. Talk about an uphill battle. Been well into the 70's and sunny just about every day for weeks now up until this week.

When I was still downhill skiing it was pretty normal to have 2-3 trips in before Thanksgiving weekend. Now you're chancing wasting a lot of money booking a Christmas week ski trip.
 
Nobody is going to have their opinion changed. Nobody.
That is the problem in a nutshell. We have lost our ability to make rational assessments of facts and information and adjust our beliefs accordingly. We have accepted being told what our point of view is by whatever sources of information we expose ourselves to, are too lazy to research this information to ***** the validity of what we are being exposed to, and vigorously defend those "beliefs" in the face of contradictory evidence.

It is like some kind of perverted fight-or-flight mechanism that causes us to shut down mentally and block the processing of information when our world view does not match what we are exposed to. Only catastrophic "I told you so" moments seem to break through and hit the point home.
 
This is what these arguments always boil down to...I'm smarter than you...you are ignorant. I'm pretty sure that Ph.D has nothing to do with hard science.

These arguments serve no good purpose other than to get people pissed off at others. Nobody is going to have their opinion changed. Nobody. The ham radio forum that I frequent has an absolute prohibition on politics...no exceptions. There are zillions of forums where people can voice their political opinions.

This board should be for the exchange of information by hikers who share a love of the outdoors and especially hiking in the Northeast.
These arguments serve no good purpose other than to get people pissed off at others. Nobody is going to have their opinion changed. Nobody.

Couldn't agree with you more.
 
That is the problem in a nutshell. We have lost our ability to make rational assessments of facts and information and adjust our beliefs accordingly. We have accepted being told what our point of view is by whatever sources of information we expose ourselves to, are too lazy to research this information to ***** the validity of what we are being exposed to, and vigorously defend those "beliefs" in the face of contradictory evidence.

It is like some kind of perverted fight-or-flight mechanism that causes us to shut down mentally and block the processing of information when our world view does not match what we are exposed to. Only catastrophic "I told you so" moments seem to break through and hit the point home.
It's even worse really. There is so much bias and so many agendas that it has become hard for people to even determine what makes sense anymore. Once integrity is lost, whether it be in the media, politicians or the private sector (whether or not related to the specific topic being discussed), people shut down, and understandably so. Some people also stand behind "science" only when it suits their agenda -- they may be 100% right but there are also times when science naturally evolves and positions are changed. It makes it hard for folks to follow much less develop any appreciation for the scientific method. And of course, the worst thing anyone can do is dismiss other people's perspectives particularly in a nasty manner, which with social media and in politics today is pretty much the norm. So it's no wonder there is so much polarization. I knew this thread would devolve fast and it delivered.
 
But the natural and physical science of climate change should not be political. I grant that the work of mainstream scientists has, in our time, become politically charged, through no fault of their own. (And so has, to a lesser extent, the science behind our understanding of the shape of the earth.) But all the same, it shouldn't be so, and the subject of climate change legitimately entered this thread because of its relationship to our interest in winter trails and their future. What *is* and should, by its nature, be political, and beyond the scope of this forum, is the matter of policy for addressing climate change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TEO
There is snow today on Monadnock if snow is your goal.

Global warming is happening. Human activity is a major part of that, if not all of that. Reversing or stopping global warming at today's level will not happen, with the possible exceptions of nuclear winter (sadly seeming more and more likely with each passing day) or a global pandemic killing 90 percent of humans alive today. Global warming rate reductions are possible, and probably a good idea. The reduction of the amount of CO2 put in the atmosphere over the last 20 years is totally inadequate for the magnitude of the issue. Get over this. Or maybe to paraphrase Freeman Dyson - embrace it. Learn to live with it. Learn to like it. Learning to live with it is the most important, and reducing the rate of change gives us a better chance at doing that.

So go seek the snow while you can. Or make it. In either case you will be contributing another small piece to the global warming, with the possible exception of walking or bicycling to the snow.
Reducing carbon emissions so as to slow (or reverse) the rate of global warming is my goal. That is obtainable.

"embrace it. Learn to live with it. Learn to like it."
Learn to like global warming?!? No thank you. I choose to despise it, and since we can do something about it, I choose to do so. I suggest you do so as well, if you care about future generations.
 
What the actual ****??

Great summary of being an elitist. I would've assumed this was sarcasm, but sadly I honestly think otherwise.
Let me see if I can summarize: you couldn't counter the argument so you decided to attack me personally instead. Got it.

Well, at least you conceded the argument is true...
 
Let me see if I can summarize: you couldn't counter the argument so you decided to attack me personally instead. Got it.

Well, at least you conceded the argument is true...
I haven't said anything about the argument, I only laughed at how self-important you make yourself sound.
 
I haven't said anything about the argument, I only laughed at how self-important you make yourself sound.
Oh, I see, so you have the ability deny the fact of climate change with science, but you just decided to attack me instead. Yes, I believe you!

I think you believe that people who employ science are condescending to you, and I believe that people who deny the fact of global warming are...well, that gets us nowhere.

I'll tell you what, since you "never said anything about the argument," let's just focus on that, you and I. On level ground. But, of course, to have level ground, let's start with introductions. You see my photo, my name is Brian Glenn and I live in Middletown, CT. Now your turn: tell us your full name and give a photo, and tell us where you live.

Then we can have a respectful conversation.
 
Top