AMC Action Plan for 2025-30

vftt.org

Help Support vftt.org:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Get your check book out now.
I've spent weeks in their MWI the past few years, using their boats and roads and campsites and shelters, and given them precisely $0 for what have been some of the best camping and fishing and wildlife and stargazing experiences of my life. If they want to preserve the 100 Mile while charging what they do for everything else, more power to them.
 
I've spent weeks in their MWI the past few years, using their boats and roads and campsites and shelters, and given them precisely $0 for what have been some of the best camping and fishing and wildlife and stargazing experiences of my life. If they want to preserve the 100 Mile while charging what they do for everything else, more power to them.
Very nice. Sounds like you had a good time. Like I said. Get your check book out.
 
I just read the entire AMC Action Plan 2025-2030, twice. With growing membership from 90,000 to 150,000, member and public
programs, loaning gear, DEI initiatives etc. I have no problems, and I cannot easily imagine how anyone could. I have found AMC people
I have met to be welcoming and inclusive throughout my membership of 30+ years. Likewise for advocacy of conservation issues
in the NE USA. Like all mission statements, this has big dreams but leaves specifics till later. It is like a party platform in politics.

That being said, some of the initiatives will need public money, and lots of it. The LWCF $300,000,000 needs a vote of Congress;
the AMC may advocate, but they will not of themselves fund that. They are one among many partners, and compromises will happen.

Region-wide, 30 new partner organizations? The AMC works now with existing groups that are smaller and more local, while being
just as committed to the same goals. "30 new" sounds a mere advertising claim that ignores the good work done together.

"Greater White Mountains Region​

Using the Franconia Ridge Trail project as a model, we will work with land management partners to secure funding for three large-scale, multi-year restoration projects. Projects like these restore highly popular trails, which can see up to 1,000 hikers a day on summer weekends and have experienced significant erosion, washouts, and overall trail degradation due to climate change." - Action Plan 2025-2030

These mountains are a land of heavy rains, steep slopes, thin organic soils. Many older trails run up and down the fall line. It takes not very much foot traffic to cause significant erosion on such trails. AMC and other pro crews, volunteer crews, and individual adopters, have all been relocating trails to lesser grades, building waterbars, steps, and pavers, chopping blowdowns and cleaning drains etc. for at least
50 years. Climate change has hastened some erosion, but trail conditions more often result from steep design, lack of erosion control
fixtures, or failure to maintain what's there. How do 3 more FRT jobs, in only 5 years, put any more workers on these other existing trails?
In fairness, the AMC and other groups are trying to do just that, but you'd not know that from this appeal.

Over to you fellow hikers. Am I fretting over a squall in a shot glass?
 
What is "MWI"?

Maine Woods Initiative. Their goal is to preserve the entire 100 Mile. So far they have acquired 100+ thousand acres near Greenville around the headwaters of the West Branch of the Pleasant River/Gulf Hagas and operate several lodges. Some of it is part of KI Jo Mary and access is managed by North Maine Woods, Inc from May to October. Much of it is still being managed as a working forest. Car camping paradise.
 
...Some of it is part of KI Jo Mary and access is managed by North Maine Woods, Inc from May to October. Much of it is still being managed as a working forest. Car camping paradise.
I've driven around a bunch of these areas, it's a fantastic place. Also hiked things here and there, pieces of the AT, little trails to various falls, etc. My girlfriend's father manages a bunch of those NMW sites, and also works at Jo Mary Campground half the year - when we go up, we camp there, on the lake with a stunning view of Katahdin. The AT is indeed kind of a preserved corridor, with logging all around.
 
Last edited:
I've spent weeks in their MWI the past few years, using their boats and roads and campsites and shelters, and given them precisely $0 for what have been some of the best camping and fishing and wildlife and stargazing experiences of my life. If they want to preserve the 100 Mile while charging what they do for everything else, more power to them.
I used to know someone in their treasurer's office. He said the huts ran even at best, or took a loss. It would be interesting to see the number of people who use their bathrooms for free over the course of a year.

The AMC was a key part of my life when I lived in Boston. Made friendships that last to this day. Am very grateful for the organization and what it does.
 
I am confused. If some of your have such fine things to say about the AMC’s MWI, why do you refuse to give the AMC any money?
I have been a member for a few years now, to support their land conservation efforts, to read their fine Appalacia journal, and to get that discount on the breakfast at the Highland Center. I have never stayed at any of their facilities, though I make use of the bathrooms and goodies to eat at the huts.
 
I am confused. If some of your have such fine things to say about the AMC’s MWI, why do you refuse to give the AMC any money?

Never been to the MWI. But in general, because I’m a cheap b*stard very frugal?

That, and it seems that if they have money for changing their logo every few years, they probably don’t need money from me.

TomK
 
the huts ran even at best, or took a loss.

They are a non-profit, right? So, I would hope that their enterprises would run about break-even, operate at a small enough loss that other income sources would cover it, or a small profit that could be set aside for use in less prosperous years.

They have a difficult balance to maintain. They want to be inexpensive enough so that the less affluent can use their services, but they still need to pay the bills.

I stayed in huts several times in the mid-eighties, and I recall thinking at the time, the prices charged then were a pretty good deal, especially considering things couldn't be simply trucked in. A few years ago, I contemplated a trip that would have involved a stay at a hut. The trip never materialized, but while checking out the details, I thought that the prices were, while less a good deal than earlier, were still not unreasonable, again, considering the circumstances.

It would be interesting to see the number of people who use their bathrooms for free over the course of a year.

More recently, when I've passed a hut, I generally use their bathroom and try to make a point of buying some baked goods. Dunno if that really helps much.

I remember thinking myself finally a "real backpacker" when I'd come off the trail after a few days of backpacking and stopped in Pinkham Notch to use the coin operated showers and change into fresh clothes for the long drive home.

You make a good point, and it spurs me to make a note to myself to send them something. Notwithstanding what I wrote earlier in the thread, I like to pay my way.

TomK
 

Latest posts

Top