Mike P.
Well-known member
Rocket,
I'll do some of your homework for you, Even a luddite like me was able to find this: https://tineye.com/search/ff0cc101872c57d472eac06775d044c71b554c1a?sort=score&order=desc&page=1
The image has been used in Forbes and the Economist going back at least from July 12th. Oddly, here is the article that image is attached too in a German news site showing that more cases are not just due to more testing. Odd, I heard that same comment here in America. https://www.blick.ch/politik/gruend...ht-nur-wegen-der-vielen-tests-id15983405.html
The same picture was used in a Forbes article to try and persuade their readers that European countries were risking injury to children. I've read the article because I'm not a fan or having to get news from one side or the other, I wish I could just get the news. Here is what I took as the crux of the Forbes' piece. What Gov't Health Ministers were saying:
"The move has been hailed by health authorities as a decisive step in controlling the virus. "With the increase in cases and the opening of schools we need to do more and get results faster," said Health Minister Roberto Speranza on Tuesday."
The Forbes piece was aimed more at this: "Despite the potential reduction in school disruptions, some pediatricians are unhappy at the decision to use swab tests on schoolchildren." They quoted one in Italy that shared their POV.
I can only assume that governments checked with more than one doctor. Either way, neither solution is perfect but going back to what we did in 2018 and pretending nothing changed is not the answer either.
BTW, July would coincide with my first two test, early July was the very invasive swabs. By the end of July, they had changed to a less invasive swabbing. We had them done before we took my M-I-L out of her retirement home for summer vacation and then were retested the following week when we returned from NJ.
I'll do some of your homework for you, Even a luddite like me was able to find this: https://tineye.com/search/ff0cc101872c57d472eac06775d044c71b554c1a?sort=score&order=desc&page=1
The image has been used in Forbes and the Economist going back at least from July 12th. Oddly, here is the article that image is attached too in a German news site showing that more cases are not just due to more testing. Odd, I heard that same comment here in America. https://www.blick.ch/politik/gruend...ht-nur-wegen-der-vielen-tests-id15983405.html
The same picture was used in a Forbes article to try and persuade their readers that European countries were risking injury to children. I've read the article because I'm not a fan or having to get news from one side or the other, I wish I could just get the news. Here is what I took as the crux of the Forbes' piece. What Gov't Health Ministers were saying:
"The move has been hailed by health authorities as a decisive step in controlling the virus. "With the increase in cases and the opening of schools we need to do more and get results faster," said Health Minister Roberto Speranza on Tuesday."
The Forbes piece was aimed more at this: "Despite the potential reduction in school disruptions, some pediatricians are unhappy at the decision to use swab tests on schoolchildren." They quoted one in Italy that shared their POV.
I can only assume that governments checked with more than one doctor. Either way, neither solution is perfect but going back to what we did in 2018 and pretending nothing changed is not the answer either.
BTW, July would coincide with my first two test, early July was the very invasive swabs. By the end of July, they had changed to a less invasive swabbing. We had them done before we took my M-I-L out of her retirement home for summer vacation and then were retested the following week when we returned from NJ.
Last edited: