And here I was thinking this was a thread about the proposed uglification of the mountainous Maine/Quebec border area where some of us like to hike.
An issue with electricity, as well as COVID and CO2, is that since you can't actually see it, it makes it easier for those with agendas to detrimentally fill in the blanks when pushing policy. Many don't understand the basics of electric generation, transmission, and consumption.
Solar and wind are intermittent sources of energy (solar is particularly limited with the minimal daylight this time of year). New England is one grid with relatively limited interconnection to New York and Canada. Since policy is driving the closure of baseload generation, the grid faces tremendous challenges as electricity consumption evolves (particularly if electric vehicles take over the automotive market). Without additional transmission, New England could be in a world of hurt if consumption increases and/or if baseload generation decreases.
Thence Seabrook and Milestone. No thread drift just grid drift.I don’t worry about the hype on either side. When Maine needs the energy it will find a way. True for all of us. Going to need nuclear at some point. Wind, solar and hydro won’t be sufficient to replace fossil fuels, and all have their problems as well. Less available energy will necessitate more conservation anyway.
Thence Seabrook and Milestone.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=42716 lists 4 (as of February 2020) operating coal plants. It also graphs the decline of coal power over 2005-2019.
...will leave the region with only four operating coal-fired plants: the Merrimack plant (439 MW) and Schiller plant (138 MW), both in New Hampshire, and the Rumford Cogeneration power plant (85 MW) and S.D. Warren Westbrook industrial plant (56 MW), both in Maine.
Tim
Run the line under Champlain.
Even nicer! And you gotta love the "isoexpress" name
Tim
...leaving Merrimack (Bow) as the last coal plant...
Don't count on the Bow plant for too much longer; it's effect on the river is pretty bad and pressure against it seems to be mounting and it may not survive its current authorization which I believe runs until 2025... https://www.nhpr.org/nh-news/2021-10-04/merrimack-station-bow-protesters-close
Well explained. Good info.Some basics on the grid and how CPC and NP fit it. (Warning very long!)
The “grid” in US is split into 3 grids they are effectively independent from each other with some minimal interconnectivity. The east coast grid is managed by several regional Independent System Operator (ISO). In New England the ISO is ISO New England. ISO NE is connected to the New York ISO (NYISO) with some limited connections to the Quebec Grid run by Hydro Quebec. The ISOs are non utility bodies that are tasked to control the flow of power and create financial incentives meet the electric power demand and maintain system reliability. Please note, they are not tasked with determining how green the power is or encouraging green power generation over non green. They do track renewables as different renewables have different reliabilities that need to be factored in overall system reliability. Renewables tend to be less reliable than conventional so as the number of renewables goes up, system reliability can go down (California is seeing this). So, ISO can “kill” a solar or wind farm but they can’t turn it on if its dark out or the wind is not blowing. In New England there is voluntary Greenhouse Gas initiative REGI to encourage green generation and discourage fossil generation but it operates separately from ISO.
ISO NE are the traffic cops for the ISO NE area and they make sure that the grid is reliable. All generation installed in the region is “hard wired” with a kill switch from ISO NE and is equipped with data transmission that continuous communicates the status of the generator. Based on the result of daily auctions matching power supply with power demand ISO NE tells which plants to send power into the grid. If the generator didn’t win the auction that day ISO NE disables the signal to the kill switch and the plant can not send power to the grid. They always keep generating capacity ready to run just in case there is shortfall in the system. They pay capacity fees to those standby generating assets to be ready to come on quickly. In some cases, so called “peaker plants” designed to start up quickly (five minutes or less) are built and rarely if ever run. They usually have big jet fuel tank next to them and are hidden away in or near urban areas for predominately disasters when the regional transmission grid has problems. They also may be run during periods of very high-power demand.
The ISO also directs the operations of the regional transmission lines that move power around. Moving power long distances is not free, there is resistance in the transmission lines and every one has a maximum rating. The lines heat up so much that they stretch and can eventually short out on vegetation. New power plants have tended to move out into lower population areas and they are larger. The existing transmission system was not designed for this and therefore ISO has to play a balancing act to move as much power as they can without knocking lines out as if they trip out on too much power flow than the power tries to shift to other lines which can overload. This can lead to Cascade trip event and an entire region can trip. Once the grid goes down it takes a long time to get it going again. ISO NE is always looking at the transmission grid predicting where there are limitations and they have the legal right to demand a system upgrade in areas with shortfalls. They also are allowed to split the costs of upgrading to everyone on the regional grid. When SE CT has reliability issues related to several factors everyone on the grid in New England had to pay for a part of the upgrade. Maine had major issues moving power east to west and its primary east west line was upgraded several years ago allowing CPC to tie into it in Lewiston. If there are limits on the transmission lines ISO may slap on congestion fees to reduce power flow or in some cases, they can curtail it. Northern NH is in that position that there is far more renewable generation in the area than can be sent to the grid. There is only one power cable crossing the AT just south of South Kinsman and that is it and its too small. The special permit it operates on from the WMNF limits its capacity to essential power demand not sending power to other areas for a profit. More often than not the windfarm and biomass plant are partially limited on how much power they can sell.
ISO NE and the regional transmission grid is always evolving to supply more power and make sure its reliable, the down side is its expensive to move power around the grid. Thus the concept of merchant power lines comes up. HQ has the power capacity at or near the border so they went out to several entities for proposals to build a private power line exclusively to move their branded green power to Mass. Several proposals were made and they picked the cheapest one that could be build quickly. Once built no one else can move power over the line unless HQ allows it. This allows them to bypass the ISO NE grid, so they do not pay transmission or congestion costs until the hook onto the grid. Mass is effectively guaranteeing they will buy the so called green power so for the company that builds the line and HQ is close to a guaranteed profit in the billions for the indefinite future. Sure, there could be Black Swans that could happen like viable cheap fusion power but HQ has several orders of magnitude of potential generation on government owned land if they have a market for it. And HQ is so big that they effectively control the elections of the people who run the government. Merchant lines are not great for ISO NE as they only have limited control or the merchant line where it hooks to the grid. Normal transmission lines are built and operated by regulated utilities and they are limited on how much return they can make so the potential profit to HQ sending the power over the regular grid is far less. Unless ISO decides they are needed for system reliability and spreads the costs out over the entire ISO NE grid these new public lines rarely get built. That leads to a lot of wind in Northern and eastern Maine along with western Maine along the Quebec border, Northern NH and the NE kingdom VT being kept out of New England power grid as there is not enough power line capacity to carry the potential supply.
What to do about regional power generation in New England to replace all the retirements? Well that is someone else’s problem. Power companies used to build power plants because they were guaranteed a profit as public utilities. They built plenty of plants to the point where they may have had surplus as every dollar spent was a guaranteed profit. So back in the Reagan era various states decided to let the private market generate power as competition would drive the prices down. It did on occasion but the big costs and risks meant the money went to projects that has unrealistic expectations. Several large combined cycle gas plants got handed back to banks and banks really do not like to run power plants. So they do not really want to finance private anymore. There is no government power like TVA in New England so the general issue that it is not of enough of crisis to get anything politically done. ISO NE has been doing studies but no one is really listening. One of them is cold winter with a shortage of natural gas.
So for the paranoid move on up to Coos county NH, we have more renewable power capacity than we can export and if the ISO New England grid goes down northern NH can still run. (During the great east cost black out in the sixties Coos county stayed up and running). If you don’t want to move then there is lot to be said for PV panels and a Lithium battery with a hybrid inverter may be good investment as power reliability in New England is going to be tough to maintain.
Enter your email address to join: