IMO some validity for the higher trailhead argument as a few more people may go there. It does not sway the vast majority or have any impact in this case, this is a fall, could happen anywhere, had he got his hand out in front of him & stopped his face from breaking his fall, likely a non-event
I'd wager many of beginning White Mountain hikers who don't stop here for their info try some of these below as first peaks: (I wonder if the WMG could have a small appendix on first 4K's to try, seperate from easy to mod hike sections in each section & descriptions that tell people which trails are bad WHich are easier?)
Washington, popular because you only have to go up (or down) for those who don't care about the FTFC. The majority of the population (not the smart folks here) think It's the tallest & baddest
After that Tecumseh probably gets some traffic from beginners, it's the lowest. some people may equate lower to easier, after all the tallest one is the baddest one.
Franoconia Loop, in summer & early this trailhead is overfilled, from the south, it's pretty easy to get too. I've seen it recommended in Walking magazine & other non-hiking places, if you asked me my favorite hike I'd say this one too. (I'd try & go off season or mid-week) It tends to get it's fair share of accidents, especially near & in winter, after, all "it's not in the Presidentials"...
After that there is something to be said about a 3,000 foot trailhead, a 2.5 hike & only 2700 of elevation gain. Compare that with the Tuckerman's trip 4.4 or so & 4200 of elevation gain. If you are just beginning that sounds pretty easy. I think Ike up Edmands is longer with about the same elevation gain too, trail conditions are very different though
You don't see many rescues on Shelborne Moriah, Zealand, South Carter & probably a few more. They don't generate traffic because they either are not on a list or only appeal to people chasing the list & usually are not anyone's first peak either. (probably not first 10 in many case)