H
Holdstrong
Guest
I was able to catch Simpson speak at the REI in boston last month (was it last month or this month? - anyway) and he flat out said that the reason he wrote the book in the first place was to let people know that Yates had no other choice when he cut that rope. And not only that, but Yates really did everything he could to get Simpson as far down the Mountain as he did, even at great risk to his own life.
Apparently Yates was really getting blasted from the climbing community when the story of the rope cutting first made its way through the grapevine - even so far as to being blacklisted by climbing organizations.
Simpson's book was to set the record straight by telling the full story.
From various interviews and articles that I have read over the years (and even in this film), Yates does strike me as a rather cantankerous guy - which may explain why he didnt get along with the producer of the film and has subsequently allowed his relationship with Simpson to wither. But this lack of relationship is not due to the rope cutting.
Apparently Yates was really getting blasted from the climbing community when the story of the rope cutting first made its way through the grapevine - even so far as to being blacklisted by climbing organizations.
Simpson's book was to set the record straight by telling the full story.
From various interviews and articles that I have read over the years (and even in this film), Yates does strike me as a rather cantankerous guy - which may explain why he didnt get along with the producer of the film and has subsequently allowed his relationship with Simpson to wither. But this lack of relationship is not due to the rope cutting.