Maybe we should do as the "Munroists" do in Scotland. Although there are a handful of 4ks in Scotland, there is but one list...the list of Munros, the peaks over 3,000 feet. Sir Hugh Munro assembled the list in 1891. Since then it has changed slightly from time to time, just as our Northeast U.S. lists have changed with new maps and measurements. There are something like 284 Munros. That's the list. Period. No hundred-highest, county high points, prominence lists, tower lists, or anything else. There's no debate about depth of cols, either. There IS no minimum col. No argument about 200' or 300' cols, minimum .75 mile distance between peaks, or any other minutia.
Following the Scots' example, we would have but one list here in the Northeast, the generally agreed-to 3k list of 770 peaks. (Whose name should we attach to it? Who's our Munro??!) We could choose from a huge variety of peaks with trails, bushwhack peaks, 6k, 5ks, 4ks, 3ks whatever, each one another notch in the 770. How liberating! Instead of 46r #4856, for example, I could say I'm at 215...only 555 left! How humbling!
jt