Human induced global warming is an inconvenient truth. There is no denying it.
The assertion that such an insignificant creature as mankind has a significant impact on climate vs the vast power of nature can not only be rightly denied, but roundly mocked and ridiculed as the human-centric arrogance that it reeks of. And I will thank you not to tell me what I may or may not deny. If you want to believe such rubbish, have at it, but please refrain from presuming to tell others what they may or may not believe.
If folks have not read it, Greta Thunberg’s book, The Climate Book, is phenomenal. Little bite sized chapters, 2-4 pages, on one specific topic, written by the world’s leading scientists in plain English. If you have any doubts about climate change, you won’t after reading that.
If each chapter is written by "the world's leading scientists", how in the world can it be called doom pixie Greta's book? Kinda confused here.
And
of course, if you just read one book, written by persuasive people and designed to persuade, why would you
not be persuaded? B, my recollection is that you are in the law business, does a judge or jury render a decision after hearing
only the prosecutor's or plaintiff's presentation? I could be wrong, but I'd expect that is unusual at best. Better to get a wide range of views. "The world's leading scientists" haven't had the best track record lately. I expect most of them are good people, trying diligently to do good work, but the track record recently is kinda spotty.
Also, NPR’s show Marketplace has an excellent new podcast on how the U.S. is grappling with climate change (since their naval bases are flooding and the boots on the ground are dealing with more temperature extremes).
State media NPR? Now
that's a credible source, right up there with doom pixie Greta, and the Washington Post, cited in your initial post of this thread. Of course, just because a source is not credible, doesn't mean that they can't be right. They could luck out.
> “In summary, La Niña is most likely to emerge in October-December 2024 (57% chance) and is expected to persist through January-March 2025.”
57% is better than a coin toss, but not by much. 43% chance of going the other way. I certainly wouldn't want a weapon of any sort fired towards me if there was a 43% chance it would hit. Sometimes you have no choice but to go with the odds, as best they can be determined, but this isn't one of those cases, and I'm content to find it an interesting tid-bit of information, and then ignore it.
Now at this point, I'm sure that Peakbagger would step in and chide me for getting far afield of discussion of hiking, and I suppose he'd be correct, so I will shut up on this thread.
I'd much rather read of B's upcoming adventure on the Cascade Brook and Kinsman Pond trails, if he is kind enough to post about it afterward.
TomK