RoySwkr
New member
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2003
- Messages
- 4,467
- Reaction score
- 285
I have a slightly different memory of this.The key is " by commercial entity". USFS does not and never has said you can't ski in the WMNF, but if you want to sell access for dollars, any commercial entity has to pony up bucks for the right to collect money.
What the FS was afraid of was people arriving at the top of Tucks Headwall and trying to ski down without having seen it from the bottom, this was thought to be too hazardous. They refused to sell concessioner permits for ski trains or helicopters. When the cog railway said they were a common carrier and required by law to sell tickets to anyone whether they had skis or not, the FS did in fact forbid skiing down Tucks from the cog. Some railway employees did it as a test and were issued citations. I think you can find this in old Appalachias.
As I recall they didn't get much ski business as it was a slow ride up and only one trail down, they actually got more sightseers who then rode back down. Obviously hiring a ski patrol and trail maintenace was expensive which is why they still give rides up and down but don't bother with calling it a ski train.I think the entire effort failed as the snow conditions were poor they year they tried it. Had it succeeded, I expect they would have gotte entangled with the FS if the tacitly allowed access to FS land.
Since the cog owns their own right-of-way which predates the National Forest, the FS cannot forbid them from running trains but can only forbid people from using them to ski down the ravine. Hence I would call that banning skiing in a small portion of the NF.